{"id":65513,"date":"2024-01-10T15:38:03","date_gmt":"2024-01-10T13:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=65513"},"modified":"2024-01-10T15:41:56","modified_gmt":"2024-01-10T13:41:56","slug":"latvijas-satanistu-banda-miera-neliekas-l-grantins-l-lapsa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=65513","title":{"rendered":"Latvijas s\u0101tanistu banda mier\u0101 neliekas (L. Granti\u0146\u0161 + L. Lapsa)!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/H-86.Grantins.LRTT_-1-800x115.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-63520\" width=\"1450\" height=\"208\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/H-86.Grantins.LRTT_-1-800x115.png 800w, https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/H-86.Grantins.LRTT_-1-300x43.png 300w, https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/H-86.Grantins.LRTT_-1-768x110.png 768w, https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/H-86.Grantins.LRTT_-1.png 1086w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1450px) 100vw, 1450px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background\" style=\"background-color:#7bdbb52e\">Kas tad ir \u0161\u012b prokurore <strong>Iluta Papsujevi\u010da<\/strong> ? T\u0101 pati <strong>Iluta Saul\u012bte <\/strong>vien ir, par kuru paskaidrots jau pirms gadiem \u0161aj\u0101 vietn\u0113. <a href=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=43331\">\u0160eit<\/a> j\u016bs redzat, cik uztraukusies ir \u0161\u012b saul\u012bte:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-iegult wp-block-embed-iegult\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UHZfE4yhkh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=31309\">Prokurores Ilutas Saul\u012btes noziegums pret latvie\u0161u tautu<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Prokurores Ilutas Saul\u012btes noziegums pret latvie\u0161u tautu&#8221; &#8212; \" src=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=31309&#038;embed=true#?secret=jm81A6Hlkf#?secret=UHZfE4yhkh\" data-secret=\"UHZfE4yhkh\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-iegult wp-block-embed-iegult\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GflZA93z9m\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=31374\">Prokurores Ilutas Saul\u012btes noziegums&#8230;.(turpin\u0101jums)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Prokurores Ilutas Saul\u012btes noziegums&#8230;.(turpin\u0101jums)&#8221; &#8212; \" src=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=31374&#038;embed=true#?secret=iDwHHtLocm#?secret=GflZA93z9m\" data-secret=\"GflZA93z9m\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background\" style=\"background-color:#7bdbb536\">Ja izlas\u012bj\u0101t, tad saprat\u0101t ar\u012b <strong>L. Lapsas<\/strong> sac\u012bto<em>(RAKSTA BEIG\u0100S VIDEO)<\/em> par tiem, kuri \u0161odien p\u0101rvalda <strong>Latviju<\/strong>. T\u0101 ir nekas vair\u0101k, k\u0101 viena nol\u0101d\u0113ta slepkavu banda, kura peln\u012bjusi<strong> FIZISKU IZN\u012aCIN\u0100\u0160ANU <\/strong>! Protams, ka \u0161os gar\u012bgos krop\u013cus, slepkavas un izdzimte\u0146us, neapmierina tiesneses <strong>A. Mo\u013c\u0146ikas L. Granti\u0146a<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=65433\">attaisnojo\u0161ais spriedums,<\/a> jo tas autom\u0101tiski nor\u0101da, ka aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101ji, t\u0101tad, \u0161odienas<strong> valdo\u0161\u0101 4. maija \u010dekistu kli\u0137e<\/strong>, ir veikusi noziegumu ne tikai pret <strong>L. Granti\u0146u, <\/strong>bet pret visu civiliz\u0113t\u0101s sabiedr\u012bbas <strong>TIESLIETU SIST\u0112MU-<\/strong> pret <strong>PATIES\u012aBU.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background\" style=\"background-color:#7bdbb536\">\u0160\u012b banda, kuru apraksta ar\u012b <strong>L. Lapsa,<\/strong> ir genoc\u012bda politikas \u012bstenot\u0101ji pret latvie\u0161u tautu- pret visu civiliz\u0113to pasauli. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background\" style=\"background-color:#7bdbb536\">Agr\u0101k vai v\u0113l\u0101k, bet par to visu b\u016bs j\u0101atbild ! Tas interesant\u0101kais, ka aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101ji netiek nosaukti !!! Par to run\u0101 ar\u012b <strong>L. Lapsa <\/strong>(<em>piebild\u012b\u0161u tikai, kas attiecas uz L. Granti\u0146u, tad \u0161aj\u0101 jaut\u0101jum\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 ir vienos ierakumos ar to pa\u0161u, vi\u0146a nosod\u012bto, Vansovi\u010du) <\/em>!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>10.01.24<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-vivid-red-background-color has-text-color has-background\" style=\"font-size:25px\">Un tagad, lasiet un br\u012bnieties !<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td><\/td><td>LATVIJAS REPUBLIKAS PROKURAT\u016aRA &nbsp; <strong>R\u012aGAS P\u0100RDAUGAVAS PROKURAT\u016aRA<\/strong> Re\u0123istr\u0101cijas Nr. 90000022859, Kalnciema iela 14, R\u012bga, LV-1048 T\u0101lrunis 67500468, fakss 67044449, e-pasts Rigas.Pardaugava@lrp.gov.lv<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>R\u012bg\u0101<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>2024. gada 2. janv\u0101r\u012b<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Elektronisk\u0101 dok. Nr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>R\u012bgas apgabaltiesas<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Krimin\u0101llietu tiesas kol\u0113\u0123ijai<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;rigas.pilseta@tiesas.lv<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>APEL\u0100CIJAS PROTESTS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 Nr. 11840002212<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ar R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesas 2023. gada 2. oktobra spriedumu krimin\u0101lliet\u0101 Nr.&nbsp;11840002212 (turpm\u0101k tekst\u0101- Spriedums) &nbsp;Linards Granti\u0146\u0161, dzimis 1950. gada 21.&nbsp;novembr\u012b,&nbsp; atz\u012bts par nevain\u012bgu \u010detru <a>noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu izdar\u012b\u0161an\u0101, kas paredz\u0113ti Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101<\/a> un divu noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu izdar\u012b\u0161an\u0101, kas paredz\u0113ti Krimin\u0101llikuma 81. pant\u0101, un attaisnots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ar pirm\u0101s instances spriedumu izlemta r\u012bc\u012bba ar dro\u0161\u012bbas naudu 5000.00 EUR apm\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pilns tiesas spriedums pieejams no&nbsp; 2023. gada 22. decembra.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 511. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 noteikts, ka spriedumam j\u0101b\u016bt tiesiskam un pamatotam. Savuk\u0101rt Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 512. panta pirm\u0101 da\u013ca noteic, ka tiesa, taisot spriedumu, pamatojas uz materi\u0101lo un procesu\u0101lo ties\u012bbu norm\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Spriedumu uzskatu par nepamatotu un nelikum\u012bgu, un izv\u0113rt\u0113jot attaisno\u0161anas mot\u012bvus, uzskatu, ka tiesa nepamatoti konstat\u0113jusi Krimin\u0101lprocesa 519. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1.&nbsp;punkt\u0101 paredz\u0113to attaisnojo\u0161a sprieduma tais\u012b\u0161anas pamatu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Spriedums neatbilst Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 511. panta otrajai da\u013cai (tiesas spriedums nav tiesisks un pamatots, un lieta nav izspriesta p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas), 512. pantam (tiesas spriedums da\u013c\u0101 par pier\u0101d\u012bjumu nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu nav pamatots ar materi\u0101lo un procesu\u0101lo ties\u012bbu norm\u0101m, k\u0101 ar\u012b tas nav pamatots ar pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem, kuri p\u0101rbaud\u012bti tiesas s\u0113d\u0113, un rakstveida pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem un dokumentiem, 525. pantam (nav nor\u0101d\u012bti mot\u012bvi, k\u0101p\u0113c tiesa noraid\u012bjusi pier\u0101d\u012bjumus ar kuriem pamatota aps\u016bdz\u012bba) pras\u012bb\u0101m, kas novedis pie nelikum\u012bga nol\u0113muma, nepamatoti attaisnojot aps\u016bdz\u0113to L. Granti\u0146u.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 127. panta pirmo da\u013cu, pier\u0101d\u012bjumi krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 ir jebkuras likum\u0101 paredz\u0113taj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 ieg\u016btas un noteikt\u0101 procesu\u0101laj\u0101 form\u0101 nostiprin\u0101tas zi\u0146as par faktiem, kurus krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 iesaist\u012bt\u0101s personas savas kompetences ietvaros izmanto pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas priek\u0161met\u0101 ietilpsto\u0161o apst\u0101k\u013cu esam\u012bbas vai neesam\u012bbas pamato\u0161anai.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atbilsto\u0161i Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 129. pant\u0101 noteiktajam, pier\u0101d\u012bjumi ir attiecin\u0101mi uz konkr\u0113to krimin\u0101lprocesu, ja zi\u0146as par faktiem tie\u0161i vai netie\u0161i apstiprina krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 pier\u0101d\u0101mo apst\u0101k\u013cu esam\u012bbu vai neesam\u012bbu, k\u0101 ar\u012b citu pier\u0101d\u012bjumu ticam\u012bbu vai neticam\u012bbu, izmanto\u0161anas iesp\u0113jam\u012bbu vai neiesp\u0113jam\u012bbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Izv\u0113rt\u0113jot Sprieduma motiv\u0101ciju, ir pamats secin\u0101jumam, ka tiesa ir p\u0101rk\u0101pusi nor\u0101d\u012bt\u0101s Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma pras\u012bbas un nav devusi v\u0113rt\u0113jumu un mot\u012bvus apst\u0101k\u013ciem, kuri ietilpst pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas priek\u0161met\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa ir pie\u013c\u0101vusi Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 18. pant\u0101 nostiprin\u0101t\u0101 procesu\u0101l\u0101 l\u012bdzv\u0113rt\u012bbas principa, 489. panta un 500. panta pirm\u0101s un otr\u0101s da\u013cas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo nepamatoti noraid\u012bja valsts aps\u016bdz\u012bbas uztur\u0113t\u0101jas l\u016bgumus par ekspertu Ilonas Kronbergas, \u0160arlotes B\u0113rzi\u0146as un \u0112rika Tre\u013ca aicin\u0101\u0161anu uz tiesas s\u0113di, noraid\u012bjumu pamatojot ar k\u013c\u016bdainu Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma normu trakt\u0113jumu, proti to, ka prokuroram Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 489. panta un 500.panta izpratn\u0113, nav ties\u012bbu uz tiesas s\u0113di aicin\u0101t ekspertus, jo ties\u012bbas pieteikt l\u016bgumus par papildus liecinieku, ekspertu uzklaus\u012b\u0161anu un jaut\u0101jumu uzdo\u0161anu ir tikai aizst\u0101v\u012bbai (2023. gada 20. apr\u012b\u013ca tiesas s\u0113des protokols). J\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka nor\u0101d\u012btie eksperti pirmstiesas proces\u0101 netika pratin\u0101ti, bet tika nor\u0101d\u012bti uz tiesas s\u0113di izsaucamo personu sarakst\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Neskatoties uz to, ka krimin\u0101lliet\u0101 ir nostiprin\u0101ti ticami, attiecin\u0101mi un pie\u013caujami pier\u0101d\u012bjumi, kas pier\u0101da L. Granti\u0146a noziedz\u012bgo r\u012bc\u012bbu un, kas pier\u0101d\u012bjumu kop\u0113j\u0101 konteksta anal\u012bzes rezult\u0101t\u0101 \u013cauj p\u0101rliecin\u0101ties par objekt\u012bvo paties\u012bbu un aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 vainu, R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nepamatoti un k\u013c\u016bdaini secin\u0101ja, ka L. Granti\u0146a izdar\u012btaj\u0101s darb\u012bb\u0101s nav visas noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma, kas paredz\u0113ts Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un Krimin\u0101llikuma 81. pant\u0101, sast\u0101va paz\u012bmes, proti, nav pier\u0101d\u012bta subjekt\u012bv\u0101 puse, un, ka liet\u0101 nav konstat\u0113jami apst\u0101k\u013ci, kas liecin\u0101tu par tie\u0161a nodoma esam\u012bbu L. Granti\u0146am inkrimin\u0113taj\u0101s darb\u012bb\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Linarda Granti\u0146a attaisnojo\u0161a Sprieduma pamat\u0101 ir nor\u0101d\u012btie, prokurora ieskat\u0101, nepareizie tiesas secin\u0101jumi un pier\u0101d\u012bjumu nov\u0113rt\u0113\u0161ana.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 atzina, ka L. Granti\u0146a izdar\u012bt\u0101s darb\u012bbas atbilst pret vi\u0146u celtaj\u0101s aps\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101s nor\u0101d\u012btaj\u0101m darb\u012bb\u0101m, bet k\u013c\u016bdaini nekonstat\u0113ja noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma subjekt\u012bvo pusi, kas Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un Krimin\u0101llikuma 81.&nbsp;pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma izdar\u012b\u0161anas gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir tie\u0161s nodoms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma subjekt\u012bvo pusi veido tie\u0161s nodoms. <a>ANO Rasu diskrimin\u0101cijas izskau\u0161anas <\/a>komiteja sav\u0101s rekomend\u0101cij\u0101s ir uzsv\u0113rusi, ka Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma subjekt\u012bv\u0101s puses konstat\u0113\u0161ana nedr\u012bkst aprobe\u017eoties tikai ar aizdom\u0101s tur\u0113t\u0101 viedok\u013ca uzklaus\u012b\u0161anu. Liet\u0101s, kur\u0101s Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma objekt\u012bv\u0101 puse ir saist\u012bta tikai naida runas form\u0101, personas nodoma izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anai var b\u016bt noz\u012bm\u012bgi vair\u0101ki apst\u0101k\u013ci. Piem\u0113ram, izteikumu satura izv\u0113rt\u0113jums to kopum\u0101, ne tikai skatot atrauti atsevi\u0161\u0137us izteikumus, konteksts, k\u0101d\u0101 izteikumi pausti, k\u0101 apstr\u012bd\u0113tos izteikumus v\u0113rt\u0113tu neitr\u0101ls las\u012bt\u0101js. Tiesa var pamatot savus secin\u0101jumus ar koment\u0101ra teksta izv\u0113rt\u0113jumu kopum\u0101, lietas materi\u0101liem pievienoto ekspertu atzinumu. Lai gan min\u0113t\u0101s instit\u016bcijas rekomend\u0101ciju statuss nav juridiski saisto\u0161s, tom\u0113r taj\u0101s ietvertais regul\u0113jums atz\u012bstams par avotu ar izteikti rekomend\u0113jo\u0161u, bet vienlaikus ar\u012b pietiekami autoritat\u012bvu raksturu, kas iesaka konkr\u0113tas probl\u0113mas risin\u0101\u0161an\u0101 izv\u0113l\u0113ties optim\u0101lo r\u012bc\u012bbas modeli (<em>Satversmes tiesas 2005.gada 14.septembra sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr. 2005-02-0106 16.punkts,<\/em> <em>2006.gada 6.j\u016bnija sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr. 2005-25-01 22.punkts<\/em>). Konkr\u0113taj\u0101 liet\u0101 ANO Rasu diskrimin\u0101cijas izskau\u0161anas komitejas rekomend\u0101cijas izmantojamas, piln\u012bg\u0101k izv\u0113rt\u0113jot vienu no noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101va elementiem, tas ir, subjekt\u012bvo pusi. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav \u0146\u0113musi v\u0113r\u0101 rekomend\u0101cij\u0101s nor\u0101d\u012bto. Ir nor\u0101d\u0101ms, ka izteikumu saturs ir viens no centr\u0101lajiem punktiem tiesu mot\u012bvos un ir b\u016btisks elements naida vai nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161an\u0101. Satura anal\u012bze var ietvert izteikuma provokat\u012bv\u0101s un tie\u0161uma pak\u0101pes noteik\u0161anu, k\u0101 ar\u012b ietvert izteikuma formas, stila argumentu rakstura izv\u0113rt\u0113jumu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka \u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101va konstat\u0113\u0161anai \u0161\u0101d\u0101s liet\u0101s svar\u012bga b\u016bs personas subjekt\u012bv\u0101 attieksme un motiv\u0101cija, veicot \u0161\u0101das darb\u012bbas <em>(Latvijas Republikas Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesa. Tiesu prakse krimin\u0101lliet\u0101s par nacion\u0101l\u0101, etnisk\u0101 un rasu naida izrais\u012b\u0161anu. R\u012bga, 2012, 51.lpp)<\/em>. Vienlaikus R\u012bgas pils\u0113ta tiesa &nbsp;Spriedum\u0101 ir izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi tikai pirmstiesas proces\u0101 aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 L. Granti\u0146a sniegt\u0101s pa\u0161a sagatavot\u0101s rakstveida liec\u012bbas (2.&nbsp; s\u0113jums 213.-217. lapa), bet nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi nevienu no tiesas izmekl\u0113\u0161an\u0101 p\u0101rbaud\u012btiem rakstveida pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem, taj\u0101 skait\u0101, L. Granti\u0146a sniegt\u0101s liec\u012bbas, kuras L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146\u0161 sniedza, tiesisk\u0101s pal\u012bdz\u012bbas l\u016bgumu izpildes laik\u0101, un kur cita starp\u0101 liecin\u0101ja: \u201dOrganiz\u0101cija \u201cLatvijas Republikas Tautas tribun\u0101ls \u201dir cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu organiz\u0101cija un agr\u0101k tika izmantota, lai aizsarg\u0101tu cilv\u0113kties\u012bbas laika period\u0101 pirms Padomju Savien\u012bbas sabruk\u0161anas. Pa\u0161reiz organiz\u0101cijas m\u0113r\u0137is ir atl\u012bdzin\u0101t par toreiz paveiktajiem noziegumiem un saukt pie atbild\u012bbas personas, kas pastr\u0101d\u0101ja \u0161os noziegumus. Uzsver, ka organiz\u0101ciju nodibin\u0101ja vi\u0146\u0161 un \u0161obr\u012bd taj\u0101 ir 4 biedri, bet vi\u0146\u0161 ir p\u0101rliecin\u0101ts, ka liel\u0101k\u0101 da\u013ca latvju tautas atz\u012bst \u0161o organiz\u0101ciju un t\u0101s darb\u012bbas. <strong>Organiz\u0101cijas m\u0113r\u0137is ir g\u0101zt Latvijas valsts varu, kur\u0101 darbojas k\u0101dreiz\u0113jie KGB darbinieki un ties\u0101t min\u0113tos darbiniekus saska\u0146\u0101 ar Nirnbergas procesiem.<\/strong> L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146\u0161 paskaidroja, ka vi\u0146\u0161 ir akt\u012bv\u0101kais biedrs un k\u0101 organiz\u0101cijas vad\u012bt\u0101js veido ar\u012b interneta m\u0101jas lapu. Publik\u0101cijas interneta vietn\u0113 www.tautastribunals.eu galvenok\u0101rt ir ievietojis vi\u0146\u0161. Ja \u0161aj\u0101 m\u0101jas lap\u0101 ir public\u0113ts raksts ar nosaukumu \u201cKur palicis SC ar Urbanovi\u010du priek\u0161gal\u0101\u201d, tad vi\u0146\u0161 par to atbild\u012bgs.&nbsp; Visi cit\u0101ti, kas vi\u0146am tika par\u0101d\u012bti no raksta \u201c16.marts. Krievu un \u017e\u012bdu asinsdarbi nekad netiks piedoti\u201d, ir vi\u0146a rakst\u012bti. Es neatk\u0101pjas no \u0161iem apgalvojumiem, jo genoc\u012bdu pret latvie\u0161u tautu patiesi \u012bstenoja komunisti un bo\u013c\u0161eviki. Ja vi\u0146am jaut\u0101, vai vi\u0146a izteicieni kurina naidu, tad vi\u0146\u0161 atbild: \u201dN\u0113, dr\u012bz\u0101k Latvij\u0101 naidu kurina \u017e\u012bdi\u201d\u201d (liec\u012bbu tulkojums 1. s\u0113j. 51.- 53. lietas lapa).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma subjekt\u012bv\u0101 puse izpau\u017eas t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, ka vain\u012bgais apzin\u0101s savas darb\u012bbas kait\u012bgumu un apzin\u0101ti to veic. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka L. Granti\u0146a tie\u0161o nodomu atkl\u0101j vi\u0146a faktisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas. Proti, to, ka &nbsp;L. Granti\u0146\u0161 savus naidu saturo\u0161os rakstus ievietoja interneta vietn\u0113, saprotot, ka raksti b\u016bs pieejami pla\u0161am personu lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu, kas paredz\u0113ts Krimin\u0101llikuma 81. pant\u0101 (Krimin\u0101llikuma redakcij\u0101 l\u012bdz 2016. gada 11. maijam) veido akt\u012bvas darb\u012bbas, kas izpau\u017eas:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1) aicin\u0101jum\u0101 vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101to valsts varu;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2) vai vardarb\u012bgi groz\u012bt valsts iek\u0101rtu;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3) vai ar\u012b \u0161\u0101dus aicin\u0101jumus saturo\u0161a materi\u0101la izplat\u012b\u0161an\u0101 t\u0101d\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 nol\u016bk\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Latvijas Republikas Satversmes 2. pantu Latvijas valsts suveren\u0101 vara pieder Latvijas tautai. Latvijas tauta varu realiz\u0113 tie\u0161i, k\u0101 ar\u012b caur valsts un pa\u0161vald\u012bbu instit\u016bcij\u0101m. Augst\u0101k\u0101 tautas varas izpausme ir tautas nobalso\u0161ana un br\u012bvas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas. Atbilsto\u0161i Latvijas Republikas Satversmei valsts varu veido likumdo\u0161anas, izpildu un tiesu vara, ko realiz\u0113 attiec\u012bg\u0101s valsts varas, p\u0101rvaldes un tiesu instit\u016bcijas. Likumdo\u0161anas varu Latvij\u0101 realiz\u0113 visp\u0101r\u012bg\u0101s, vienl\u012bdz\u012bg\u0101s, tie\u0161\u0101s, aizkl\u0101t\u0101s un proporcion\u0101l\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s iev\u0113l\u0113ta Latvijas Republikas Saeima. Likumdo\u0161anas ties\u012bbas pieder Saeimai, k\u0101 ar\u012b tautai Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 paredz\u0113t\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 un apm\u0113ros. Izpildu varu realiz\u0113 Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabinets, kas sast\u0101v no ministru prezidenta un vi\u0146a aicin\u0101tiem ministriem. Ministru kabinetu sast\u0101da persona, kurai to uztic Valsts prezidents. Ministru kabinetam ir padotas valsts p\u0101rvaldes iest\u0101des. Valsts iek\u0101rta ir valsts galveno paz\u012bmju kopums, kas raksturo t\u0101s b\u016bt\u012bbu, uzb\u016bvi un darb\u012bbas principus. Ar valsts iek\u0101rtas groz\u012b\u0161anu j\u0101saprot t\u0101s piln\u012bga vai da\u013c\u0113ja izmai\u0146a, izn\u012bcinot vai radot no jauna valsts varas vai p\u0101rvaldes instit\u016bcijas, \u012bpa\u0161uma formu radik\u0101la izmai\u0146a, saimniec\u012bbas sist\u0113mas p\u0101rk\u0101rto\u0161ana u.tml. Ikviena no \u0161\u012bm darb\u012bb\u0101m veido patst\u0101v\u012bgu nozieguma sast\u0101vu, ja t\u0101 tiek izdar\u012bta, p\u0101rk\u0101pjot Latvijas Republikas Satversmi. Aicin\u0101jumi ir t\u0101da iedarb\u012bbas forma uz cilv\u0113ku apzi\u0146u, gribu, vi\u0146u uzved\u012bbu, kad tie\u0161i iedarbojoties uz vi\u0146iem, veidojas v\u0113lme veikt noteikta veida m\u0113r\u0137tiec\u012bgu darb\u012bbu. Persona aicin\u0101jumu g\u0101zt valsts varu vai groz\u012bt valsts iek\u0101rtu izsaka pla\u0161\u0101kam cilv\u0113ku lokam un \u0161\u0101du aicin\u0101jumu izplat\u012b\u0161anu var izdar\u012bt ikvien\u0101 klaus\u012bt\u0101jiem jeb skat\u012bt\u0101jiem pieejam\u0101 form\u0101 un veid\u0101. Aicin\u0101jumam j\u0101b\u016bt publiskam, kas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka tas izteikts atkl\u0101ti, cilv\u0113kiem pieejam\u0101 un saprotam\u0101 veid\u0101, tas ir, citu personu kl\u0101tb\u016btn\u0113 vai ar\u012b t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101, ka ar\u012b kl\u0101t neeso\u0161as personas var ar tiem iepaz\u012bties. Vai aicin\u0101jums ir publisks, j\u0101izlemj, iev\u0113rojot visu apst\u0101k\u013cu kopumu &#8211; vietu, laiku, situ\u0101ciju un citus apst\u0101k\u013cus, k\u0101dos tas izteikts. Aicin\u0101jumu g\u0101zt valsts varu vai groz\u012bt valsts iek\u0101rtu saturo\u0161i materi\u0101li ir bro\u0161\u016bras un cit\u0101di izdevumi, masu sazi\u0146as l\u012bdzek\u013cu izdevumi un p\u0101rraides, z\u012bm\u0113jumi rokrakst\u0101 un tehnisk\u0101 izpild\u012bjum\u0101 vai cit\u0101d\u0101k\u0101 izplat\u012b\u0161anai iesp\u0113jam\u0101 veid\u0101 un form\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Savuk\u0101rt \u0161\u012b nozieguma subjekt\u012bv\u0101 puse izpau\u017eas tie\u0161a nodoma veid\u0101, jo personas darb\u012bbas tiek izdar\u012btas ar noteiktu m\u0113r\u0137i, kuru vi\u0146a v\u0113las sasniegt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nozieguma sast\u0101vs ir form\u0101ls un nodar\u012bjums ir pabeigts ar darb\u012bbas izdar\u012b\u0161anas br\u012bdi, un kait\u012bgu seku iest\u0101\u0161an\u0101s nozieguma sast\u0101v\u0101 netiek pras\u012bta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kaut ar\u012b v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bba ietver sev\u012b kritiz\u0113t vald\u012bbu <em>(Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesas spriedums liet\u0101: 11798\/85 Castells v. Spain, para 46) <\/em>un politi\u0137us, R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa, taisot attaisnojo\u0161u spriedumu, k\u013c\u016bdaini nekonstat\u0113ja, ka L. Granti\u0146a ievietoti raksti:<strong> <\/strong><a>\u201c16.marts Krievu un \u017e\u012bdu asinsdarbi nekad netiks piedoti\u201d un<\/a> \u201cParaz\u012btisk\u0101 prezidenta B\u0113rzi\u0146a \u201cgai\u0161redz\u012bba\u201d iziet \u0101rpus \u0161\u012bm ties\u012bb\u0101m, jo, ne tikai izplata uzskatus, kas aizskar rakstos nor\u0101d\u012bto politi\u0137u godu un cie\u0146u, bet ar\u012b publiski (raksti ir pieejami neierobe\u017eotam Interneta lietot\u0101ju lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113) aicina r\u012bkoties \u0101rpus Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101tai k\u0101rt\u012bbai, un vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt valsts varu, k\u0101 ar\u012b veikt prettiesisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas pret pie varas eso\u0161iem politi\u0137iem- prettiesiski non\u0101v\u0113t vi\u0146us, pak\u0101rot, k\u0101 ar\u012b draud ar sodu. Spriedum\u0101 nav v\u0113rt\u0113ts, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161 k\u0101 rakstu autors nor\u0101da, ka <a>Latvijas Republikas valsts varas instit\u016bcijas <\/a>(LR vald\u012bba un Saeima) ir izn\u012bcin\u0101mas, piem\u0113rojot to sast\u0101v\u0101 eso\u0161\u0101m amatperson\u0101m \u201caugst\u0101ko soda m\u0113ru\u201d (n\u0101vessodu), un, ka neitr\u0101ls las\u012bt\u0101js var izdar\u012bt secin\u0101jumu, ka 4. maija Deklar\u0101cijas pie\u0146em\u0161anas rezult\u0101t\u0101 atjaunot\u0101 Latvijas Republika un to p\u0101rst\u0101vo\u0161\u0101s valsts varas instit\u016bcijas ir fiziski j\u0101izn\u012bcina. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav v\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161 ir r\u012bkojies apzin\u0101ti- s\u0101kotn\u0113ji formul\u0113jis savus uzskatus, pierakst\u012bjis tos un izmantojot autom\u0101tisku datu apstr\u0101des sist\u0113mu, ievietojis tos interneta vid\u0113, lai p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas pla\u0161\u0101ks las\u012bt\u0101ju loks ar to var\u0113tu iepaz\u012bties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taisot attaisnojo\u0161u spriedumu, R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi interneta vietn\u0113 L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146a public\u0113to rakstu smagumu, nav \u0146\u0113musi v\u0113r\u0101 soci\u0101lo un politisko kontekstu, k\u0101d\u0101 tika pausti un izplat\u012bti raksti. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav v\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146\u0161 rakstos lieto agres\u012bvu rakst\u012bbas stilu, \u017eargona v\u0101rdus, izsak\u0101s, pau\u017eot naidu, pie publik\u0101cij\u0101m pievienoja fotogr\u0101fijas (las\u012bt\u0101jam vizu\u0101li ir iesp\u0113jams atpaz\u012bt foto att\u0113los redzamos Latvijas politi\u0137us, taj\u0101 skait\u0101, prezidentu), proti, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di veica darb\u012bbas, kas aizskar citas personas. Tiesa nav \u0146\u0113musi v\u0113r\u0101, ka aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 raksti neitr\u0101lam skat\u012bt\u0101jam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113 rad\u012bja priek\u0161statu par to, ka krievi un ebreji ir zv\u0113ri, t.i. nav cilv\u0113ki, nav pieder\u012bgi cilv\u0113kiem un nav atz\u012bstami par cilv\u0113kiem, tiem nav ties\u012bbu past\u0101v\u0113t, un aicina pret krievu un ebreju taut\u012bbas p\u0101rst\u0101vjiem veikt prettiesisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas, kas izpau\u017eas \u0161o cilv\u0113ku grupu vaj\u0101\u0161an\u0101, pamatojoties uz nacion\u0101lo pieder\u012bbu un nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu likvid\u0113t krievu un ebreju taut\u012bbas cilv\u0113kus, ka \u0161o taut\u012bbu cilv\u0113kiem nav ties\u012bbu dz\u012bvot un, ka \u0161o taut\u012bbu cilv\u0113ki ir j\u0101izn\u012bcina. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 k\u013c\u016bdaini nekonstat\u0113ja, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161 apzin\u0101j\u0101s public\u0113tos aicin\u0101jumus un apzin\u0101j\u0101s, ka vi\u0146\u0161 pied\u0101v\u0101 veikt prettiesisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas (holokaustu), nol\u016bk\u0101 piln\u012bgi izn\u012bcin\u0101t krievu un ebreju taut\u012bbai pieder\u012bgu cilv\u0113ku grupu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka raksti publiskoti ar augstu regulit\u0101ti un tajos izteiktie viedok\u013ci satur intens\u012bvu un sp\u0113c\u012bgu naid\u012bgumu, kuru kvantit\u0101te las\u012bt\u0101jam rada vai var rad\u012bt draudu realit\u0101tes saj\u016btu un las\u012bt\u0101jiem nav pamata \u0161aub\u012bties, ka publik\u0101ciju autora nol\u016bki ir pietiekami nopietni un v\u0113r\u0101 \u0146emami, un var b\u016bt iesp\u0113jamas konkr\u0113tas darb\u012bbas izvirz\u012bto m\u0113r\u0137u sasnieg\u0161anai, jo interneta vietne <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a> ir speci\u0101li L. Granti\u0146a izveidota, lai paustu l\u012bdz\u012bga satura viedok\u013cus k\u0101 L. Granti\u0146am- tai skait\u0101 iesp\u0113ju koment\u0113t \u0161aj\u0101 vietn\u0113 ietvert\u0101s publik\u0101cijas, kas v\u0113rt\u0113jams, k\u0101 apzin\u0101tas iesp\u0113jas rad\u012b\u0161ana las\u012bt\u0101jiem izveidot diskusiju par publik\u0101cij\u0101s skartaj\u0101m t\u0113m\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa, taisot attaisnojo\u0161u Spriedumu, nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka pie L. Granti\u0146a rakstiem ir virkne las\u012bt\u0101ju ievietotu koment\u0101ru, un iepaz\u012bstoties ar to saturu, nerodas \u0161aubas, ka koment\u0101ri ir tie\u0161i saist\u012bti ar autora L. Granti\u0146a naid\u012bgo runu publik\u0101cij\u0101m, un, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146\u0161 ir objekt\u012bvi izrais\u012bjis naidu un nesatic\u012bbu starp da\u017e\u0101diem taut\u012bbu cilv\u0113kiem, pau\u017eot publiski pieejam\u0101 telp\u0101 savu inform\u0101ciju, kas izraisa naidu pret krievu un ebreju taut\u012bbas cilv\u0113kiem un Latvijas Republikas valsts varas instit\u016bcij\u0101m (amatperson\u0101m). Tiesa nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, k\u0101du iespaidu uz las\u012bt\u0101jiem L. Granti\u0146a publiskotais teksts ir atst\u0101jis, proti, to, ka L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146\u0161 ir ne tikai publiskojis tekstu, kas kurina naidu starp da\u017e\u0101du taut\u012bbu cilv\u0113kiem un aicin\u0101jumu sod\u012bt valsts augst\u0101k\u0101s amatpersonas, bet ar\u012b \u0161\u012bs naida j\u016btas izrais\u012bja citos cilv\u0113kos, kuri iepazinu\u0161ies ar L. Granti\u0146a publik\u0101cij\u0101m, savas naidu saturo\u0161\u0101s emocijas paudu\u0161i koment\u0101ros.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa nav \u0146\u0113musi v\u0113r\u0101 tiesu praks\u0113 izteikt\u0101s atzi\u0146as, ka Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101va konstat\u0113\u0161anai svar\u012bga noz\u012bme ir ne vien aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 liec\u012bb\u0101m, bet ar\u012b vi\u0146a uzved\u012bbai noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma izdar\u012b\u0161anas laik\u0101, proti, R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161 akt\u012bvi sniedza atbildes savu rakstu koment\u0113t\u0101jiem, veidojot diskusijas, kur\u0101s turpin\u0101ja paust savus naidu saturo\u0161us izteikumus, k\u0101 ar\u012b nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi L. Granti\u0146a saist\u012bbu ar naidu kurino\u0161o vietni www.tautastribunals.eu.<em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa k\u013c\u016bdaini atzina, ka L. Granti\u0146a raksti ir visp\u0101r\u012bgi un nekonkr\u0113ti, ka autora nodoms nav tie\u0161i izprotams, ka rakstos nor\u0101d\u012btais ir visp\u0101r\u012bgs apcer\u0113jums par politisk\u0101s elites darb\u012bb\u0101m, sasaistot tos ar v\u0113sturiskiem notikumiem, neskatoties uz to, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161 public\u0113tajos rakstos sniedz zi\u0146as par notikumiem un politi\u0137iem 2012. gad\u0101 (proti, par tagadni- uz publik\u0101ciju tap\u0161anas br\u012bdi), k\u0101 ar\u012b rakstiem pievieno pie varas eso\u0161o politi\u0137u un sabiedr\u012bb\u0101 zin\u0101mo cilv\u0113ku foto att\u0113lus. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa ir k\u013c\u016bdaini secin\u0101jusi, ka aps\u016bdz\u0113tais krievu un ebreju taut\u012bbu cilv\u0113kus atspogu\u013co k\u0101 kait\u0113juma avotu, pret kuriem b\u016btu v\u0113r\u0101 \u0146emama pretdarb\u012bba, jo aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 v\u0113lme ir pateikt, ka latvie\u0161u tautu pag\u0101tn\u0113, it \u012bpa\u0161i 2. pasaules kar\u0101, ir noslepkavoju\u0161i cilv\u0113ki, no kuriem liel\u0101k\u0101 da\u013ca p\u0113c izcelsmes bija krievi un \u017e\u012bdi, uzsverot, ka ar \u0161iem apz\u012bm\u0113jumiem j\u0101saprot tikai prec\u012bz\u0101ks toreiz\u0113jo noziedznieku apraksts, nevis \u0161o tautu no\u0137eng\u0101\u0161ana m\u016bsdien\u0101s. Min\u0113tos k\u013c\u016bdainos secin\u0101jumus R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa ir izdar\u012bjusi, jo nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi ekspertu atzinumos sniegtos secin\u0101jumus un visus krimin\u0101lliet\u0101 eso\u0161os rakstveida pier\u0101d\u012bjumus, nepamatoti atz\u012bstot par ticam\u0101m tikai L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146a pirmstiesas proces\u0101 sniegt\u0101s liec\u012bbas par tie\u0161\u0101 nodoma neesam\u012bbu vi\u0146a darb\u012bb\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesa (turpm\u0101k ar\u012b \u2013 ECT) ir atzinusi, ka Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu un pamatbr\u012bv\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas konvencijas 10.&nbsp;pant\u0101 garant\u0113t\u0101 v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bba, kas ir demokr\u0101tiskas sabiedr\u012bbas st\u016brakmens un pamatnosac\u012bjums sabiedr\u012bbas progresam un katra indiv\u012bda pa\u0161izaugsmei, aizsarg\u0101 ne tikai inform\u0101ciju un idejas, kas tiek pie\u0146emtas vai uzskat\u012btas par neaizskaro\u0161\u0101m vai pret kur\u0101m ir vienaldz\u012bga attieksme, bet ar\u012b t\u0101du inform\u0101ciju un idejas, kas aizvaino, \u0161ok\u0113 un satricina (<em>Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesas (Liel\u0101 pal\u0101ta)<\/em> <em>2016. gada 29. marta sprieduma liet\u0101 \u201eBedat v. Switzerland\u201d, iesnieguma Nr. <\/em><em>56925\/08<\/em><em>,<\/em> <em>48. punkts, Liel\u0101s pal\u0101tas 1999. gada 8. j\u016blija sprieduma liet\u0101 \u201eSurek v. Turkey\u201d, iesnieguma<\/em> <em>Nr. <\/em><em>26682\/95<\/em><em>, 58. punkts<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 L. Granti\u0146a&nbsp; tie\u0161o nodomu izdar\u012bt Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un Krimin\u0101llikuma 81. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113to noziedz\u012bgo nodar\u012bjumu atkl\u0101j <a>vi\u0146a faktisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas, ievietojot rakstus interneta vietn\u0113, turkl\u0101t apzinoties, ka raksti b\u016bs pieejams neierobe\u017eotam personu lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113<\/a>. Vienlaikus ir j\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113 un tiesai Spriedum\u0101 bija j\u0101izv\u0113rt\u0113 inform\u0101cijas pieejam\u012bbas pla\u0161umu atbilsto\u0161i Rabatas principiem, proti, rakstiem pievienoto koment\u0101ru skaitu, koment\u0101ru saturu, k\u0101 ar\u012b rakstu pieejam\u012bbas ilgumu, proti, to, ka raksti ir pieejami joproj\u0101m L. Granti\u0146a izveidotaj\u0101 interneta vietn\u0113 www.tautastribunals.eu. K\u0101 ar\u012b R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi zi\u0146as, par L. Granti\u0146a statusu un atpaz\u012bstam\u012bbu sabiedr\u012bb\u0101, proti, to, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161 ir&nbsp; ar\u012b aizst\u0101v\u012bbas grupas \u201c Helsinki 86\u201d dibin\u0101t\u0101js un vi\u0146am ir pieredze politik\u0101 <em>( <\/em><strong><em>Helsinki-86<\/em><\/strong><em> bija <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Latvija\"><em>Latvijas<\/em><\/a><em> <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cilv%C4%93kties%C4%ABbas\"><em>cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu<\/em><\/a><em> aizst\u0101v\u012bbas grupa, ko 1986. gada j\u016bnij\u0101 <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Liep%C4%81ja\"><em>Liep\u0101j\u0101<\/em><\/a><em> nodibin\u0101ja <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Linards_Granti%C5%86%C5%A1\"><em>Linards Granti\u0146\u0161<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Raimonds_Bitenieks\"><em>Raimonds Bitenieks<\/em><\/a><em> un <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/M%C4%81rti%C5%86%C5%A1_Bariss\"><em>M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Bariss<\/em><\/a><em>, ar m\u0113r\u0137i sekot, k\u0101 tiek iev\u0113rotas <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/lv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Latvie%C5%A1i\"><em>latvie\u0161u<\/em><\/a><em> tautas ekonomisk\u0101s, kult\u016bras un indiv\u012bda ties\u012bbas).<\/em> T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di ir neapstr\u012bdams fakts, ka L. Granti\u0146am ir ietekme uz las\u012bt\u0101jiem, kuri las\u012bja interneta vietn\u0113 public\u0113tos rakstus un tos ar\u012b akt\u012bvi koment\u0113ja, un kuriem bija dom\u0101ti rakstos paustie izteikumi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Katru Krimin\u0101llikum\u0101 iek\u013cauto noziedz\u012bgo nodar\u012bjumu, veido Krimin\u0101llikuma Visp\u0101r\u012bg\u0101s un Sevi\u0161\u0137\u0101s da\u013c\u0101s norm\u0101s noteikto objekt\u012bvo un subjekt\u012bvo paz\u012bmju kopums (objekts, objekt\u012bv\u0101 puse, subjekts, subjekt\u012bv\u0101 puse), kas nepiecie\u0161ams un pietiekams, lai raksturotu noteikt\u0101 veida noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu. Tikai t\u0101ds nodar\u012bjums, kas atbilst noziedz\u012bga nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101vam, ieg\u016bst juridiska fakta noz\u012bmi un k\u013c\u016bst par krimin\u0101latbild\u012bbas pamatu, bet ja nodar\u012bjum\u0101 iztr\u016bkst k\u0101da no paredz\u0113taj\u0101m paz\u012bm\u0113m, nav ar\u012b noziedz\u012bga nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101va. Krimin\u0101lties\u012bbu teorija nosaka, ka krimin\u0101latbild\u012bba iest\u0101jas, ja nodar\u012bjum\u0101 ir konstat\u0113ts kait\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums, bet likum\u0101 paredz\u0113tos gad\u012bjumos ar\u012b kait\u012bgas sekas, un persona ir vain\u012bga noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjum\u0101. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 124. panta otro da\u013cu krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 pier\u0101d\u0101ma noziedz\u012bga nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101va esam\u012bba vai neesam\u012bba, k\u0101 ar\u012b citi Krimin\u0101llikum\u0101 un Krimin\u0101lprocesa likum\u0101 paredz\u0113tie apst\u0101k\u013ci, kuriem ir noz\u012bme konkr\u0113to krimin\u0101ltiesisko attiec\u012bbu taisn\u012bg\u0101 noregul\u0113jum\u0101. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101llikuma 9. pantu noziedz\u012bgais nodar\u012bjums atz\u012bstams par izdar\u012btu ar tie\u0161u nodomu, ja persona, kas to izdar\u012bjusi, ir paredz\u0113jusi nodar\u012bjuma sekas un v\u0113l\u0113jusies t\u0101s. No subjekt\u012bv\u0101s puses noziegums izdar\u012bts ar tie\u0161u nodomu. Aps\u016bdz\u0113tajam L&nbsp;Granti\u0146am ir ieg\u016bta izgl\u012bt\u012bba, liet\u0101 nav zi\u0146u par L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146a sast\u0101v\u0113\u0161anu uzskait\u0113s pie psihiatra un narkologa. Aps\u016bdz\u012bbas uztur\u0113t\u0101ja ieskat\u0101 L. Granti\u0146a tie\u0161o nodomu liecina un atkl\u0101j vi\u0146a r\u012bc\u012bba, r\u012bkojoties m\u0113r\u0137tiec\u012bgi, lietojot sarkastisku rakst\u012bbas stilu, kas \u013cauj piekrist eksperta viedoklim, ka aps\u016bdz\u0113tais ir r\u016bp\u012bgi piemekl\u0113jis v\u0101rdus, apsv\u0113ris pau\u017eamo domu un publiskojis to interneta vietn\u0113, ko apmekl\u0113 pla\u0161s las\u012bt\u0101ju loks. Uzskatu, ka L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146am, kur\u0161 ir izgl\u012btots cilv\u0113ks un kuram nav konstat\u0113tas psihiskas novirzes, bija j\u0101pazin\u0101s savas r\u012bc\u012bbas prettiesiskums, un vi\u0146\u0161 nemaz ar\u012b nevar\u0113ja neapzin\u0101ties savas r\u012bc\u012bbas prettiesiskumu. Uzskatu, ka b\u016bdams pilngad\u012bga, pieskait\u0101ma un izgl\u012btota persona ar pieredzi politikas jaut\u0101jumos, aps\u016bdz\u0113tais L. Granti\u0146\u0161 apzin\u0101j\u0101s, ka raksti ar tekstu:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201d <em>Krievi, \u017e\u012bdi un komunisti nav pieder\u012bgi cilv\u0113ku rasei.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Dievs \u0161\u012bs zv\u0113ru tautas noslauc\u012bs no zemes virsas. T\u0101 tas ST\u0100V rakst\u012bts un t\u0101 tam b\u016bs b\u016bt.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Bet pats galvenais !!!, m\u0113s p\u0101rliecin\u0101j\u0101mies, ka krievi un \u017e\u012bdi ir zv\u0113ri, kuriem nekad nedr\u012bkst tic\u0113t.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reiz pien\u0101ks diena, kad visa pasaules sabiedr\u012bba \u0161\u012bs divas tautas pasludin\u0101s \u0101rpus likuma. Ko tas noz\u012bm\u0113, paskaidrojumi nav j\u0101sniedz.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Pien\u0101ks diena, Kad Latvijas vald\u012bba pie\u0146ems LIKUMU, kas aizliegs \u017e\u012bdiem Latvij\u0101 \u201ck\u0101ju spert\u201d uz t\u016bksto\u0161 gadiem.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>J\u0101, noziedzniek b\u0113rzi\u0146, tuv\u0101kie gadi nes\u012bs neiedom\u0101jamas p\u0101rmai\u0146as, tev taisn\u012bba. Tu un tev l\u012bdz\u012bgie tiks arest\u0113ti un aizvilkti uz kar\u0101tav\u0101m. T\u0101 ir vien\u012bg\u0101 vieta priek\u0161 s\u0101taniskajiem komunistu izdzimte\u0146iem\u201d,<\/em>kurina nacion\u0101lo naidu un ir apzin\u0101ti v\u0113rsti uz nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu, un aicina vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101to valsts varu un vardarb\u012bgi groz\u012bt valsts iek\u0101rtu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ts 2006. gada 28. decembra spriedum\u0101 SKK-0770-06 ir nor\u0101d\u012bjis, ka \u201cNotikuma paties\u012bbas noskaidro\u0161anas krit\u0113riji ir sapr\u0101t\u012bgu \u0161aubu esam\u012bba vai neesam\u012bba par pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas priek\u0161met\u0101 ietilpsto\u0161ajiem apst\u0101k\u013ciem, un tas saist\u012bts ar pier\u0101d\u012bjumu pietiekam\u012bbu.&nbsp; Aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 nodoma patieso saturu atkl\u0101j ar\u012b vi\u0146a faktisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas\u201d. R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi, ka L.&nbsp;Granti\u0146a raksti interneta vietn\u0113 tika ievietoti apzin\u0101ti, nevis tas noticis k\u013c\u016bdas d\u0113\u013c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; J\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka ar\u012b <a>Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesa <\/a>ir atzinusi, ka demokr\u0101tisk\u0101 sabiedr\u012bb\u0101 nav pie\u013caujamas izpausmes formas, kas izplata, atbalsta un attaisno vardarb\u012bbu, naidu vai neieciet\u012bbu (<em>Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesas 2018. gada 9. maija sprieduma liet\u0101 <\/em>\u201e<em>Stomakhin v. Russia\u201d,iesnieguma Nr. <\/em><em>52273\/07<\/em><em>, 92. punkts<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di uzskatu, ka ar liet\u0101 eso\u0161ajiem pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem, kas ir ticami, attiecin\u0101mi un pie\u013caujami ir pier\u0101d\u012bts \u0101rpus sapr\u0101t\u012bg\u0101m \u0161aub\u0101m aps\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012btais, ka rakstu interneta vietn\u0113 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a> public\u0113jis&nbsp; un ievietot\u0101js interneta vietn\u0113 bija L. Granti\u0146\u0161, kas izriet no liet\u0101 ieg\u016bto pier\u0101d\u012bjumu kopuma, un, ko L. Granti\u0146\u0161 nenoliedz un neapstr\u012bd, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, pier\u0101d\u012bts, ka L. Granti\u0146\u0161, izdar\u012bja darb\u012bbas, kas v\u0113rstas uz nacion\u0101l\u0101 naida un nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu, izmantojot automatiz\u0113tu datu apstr\u0101des sist\u0113mu un publiski aicin\u0101ja vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101to valsts varu un vardarb\u012bgi groz\u012bt valsts iek\u0101rtu, k\u0101 ar\u012b izplat\u012bja \u0161\u0101du aicin\u0101jumu saturo\u0161a materi\u0101lu t\u0101d\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 nol\u016bk\u0101, un vi\u0146a darb\u012bbas ir pareizi kvalific\u0113tas p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otr\u0101s da\u013cas un Krimin\u0101llikuma 81. panta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Uzskatu, ka R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 k\u013c\u016bdaini atzina, ka ekspertu I. Kronbergas, \u0160.&nbsp;B\u0113rzi\u0146as un \u0112. Tre\u013ca atzinumos min\u0113t\u0101s zi\u0146as nenor\u0101da uz aps\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 L. Granti\u0146a tie\u0161u nodomu izdar\u012bt Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un 81. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113tos noziedz\u012bgos nodar\u012bjumus, un ekspertu atzinumos min\u0113tais nav izmantojams L. Granti\u0146a vainas pamato\u0161anai.&nbsp; Uzskatu, ka eksperti teksta izp\u0113tes gait\u0101 un savos secin\u0101jumos nor\u0101d\u012bja L. Granti\u0146a faktisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas, ievietojot rakstus interneta vietn\u0113, apzinoties, ka raksti b\u016bs pieejami neierobe\u017eotam personu lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113. Neskatoties uz to, ka R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesai Spriedum\u0101 bija j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113 eksperta atzinumos nor\u0101d\u012bt\u0101s zi\u0146as un secin\u0101jumi kopsakar\u012bb\u0101, ar\u012b valsts aps\u016bdz\u012bbas uztur\u0113t\u0101jas ieskat\u0101 L.Granti\u0146a public\u0113tie raksti ir apzin\u0101ti v\u0113rsti uz nacion\u0101l\u0101 naida vai nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu, bet raksti: \u201c16.marts Krievu un \u017e\u012bdu asinsdarbi nekad netiks piedoti\u201d un \u201cParaz\u012btisk\u0101 prezidenta B\u0113rzi\u0146a \u201cgai\u0161redz\u012bba\u201d publiski (raksti ir pieejami neierobe\u017eotam Interneta lietot\u0101ju lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113) aicina r\u012bkoties \u0101rpus Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101tai k\u0101rt\u012bbai, un vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt valsts varu, k\u0101 ar\u012b veikt prettiesisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas pret pie varas eso\u0161iem politi\u0137iem- prettiesiski non\u0101v\u0113t vi\u0146us, pak\u0101rot, k\u0101 ar\u012b draud ar sodu.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi \u0161\u0101dus rakstveida pier\u0101d\u012bjumus:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>ar 2013.gada 15.marta m\u0101j\u0101s lap\u0101 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a> ievietoto rakstu apskates protokolu un izdruk\u0101tajiem rakstiem. \/1. s\u0113j. 118.-119., 120.-145. lietas lapa\/ No protokol\u0101 fiks\u0113taj\u0101m zi\u0146\u0101m secin\u0101ms, ka 2013. gada 15. mart\u0101 tika apskat\u012bta m\u0101jas lapa <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a>, kur\u0101 public\u0113ti aps\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101 min\u0113tie raksti, k\u0101 ar\u012b apskat\u012bti koment\u0101ri pie rakstiem: 1 raksts &#8211; 16 koment\u0101ri, 2 raksts- 31 koment\u0101rs, 3 raksts- 15 koment\u0101ri, 4 raksts- 9 koment\u0101ri, kas pier\u0101da, ka cilv\u0113ki akt\u012bvi&nbsp; koment\u0113ja L. Granti\u0146a rakstus. Apskates protokolam pievienoti 6 pielikumi uz 26 lap\u0101m ar rakstiem un koment\u0101riem pie tiem.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>2012.gada 21.decembra ekspertes I. Kronbergas atzinumu. \/1.s\u0113j.68.-116.lietas lapa\/ <a>No eksperta atzinuma secin\u0101jumiem izriet, ka analiz\u0113tie teksti interneta vietn\u0113 <\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a> kopum\u0101 v\u0113rt\u0113jami k\u0101 apzin\u0101ti v\u0113rsti uz nacion\u0101l\u0101 naida vai nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu, bet raksti: \u201c16.marts Krievu un \u017e\u012bdu asinsdarbi nekad netiks piedoti\u201d un \u201cParaz\u012btisk\u0101 prezidenta B\u0113rzi\u0146a \u201cgai\u0161redz\u012bba\u201d publiski (raksti ir pieejami neierobe\u017eotam Interneta lietot\u0101ju lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113) aicina r\u012bkoties \u0101rpus Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101tai k\u0101rt\u012bbai un vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt valsts varu, k\u0101 ar\u012b veikt prettiesisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas pret pie varas eso\u0161iem politi\u0137iem- prettiesiski non\u0101v\u0113t vi\u0146us, pak\u0101rot, k\u0101 ar\u012b draud ar sodu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>2012.gada 8.augusta Ties\u012bbsarga biroja Tiesisk\u0101s vienl\u012bdz\u012bbas noda\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101jas \u0160arlotes B\u0113rzi\u0146as eksperta atzinumu. \/1. s\u0113j. 175.-177. lietas lapa\/ No eksperta atzinuma secin\u0101ms, ka 2012.&nbsp;gada 6. apr\u012bl\u012b interneta vietn\u0113 www.tautastribunals.eu, kas pieejama publiskai apskatei, public\u0113taj\u0101 rakst\u0101&nbsp; \u201cLRTT atbilde Izra\u0113las p\u0101rst\u0101vei Latvij\u0101\u201d ir pausta inform\u0101cija, kas ebrejus, j\u016bdus atspogu\u013co k\u0101 kait\u0113juma avotu, t\u0101dus pret kuriem b\u016btu v\u0113r\u0161ama pretdarb\u012bba, l\u012bdz ar ko var secin\u0101t, ka raksta autors www.tautatribunals.eu vad\u012bba apzin\u0101s savas darb\u012bbas un \u0161\u012bs darb\u012bbas v\u0113rstas uz nacion\u0101l\u0101, etnisk\u0101 vai rasu naida vai nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu pret ebreju, j\u016bdu taut\u012bbas p\u0101rst\u0101vjiem un p\u0113c sava satura un form\u0101s iziet \u0101rpus Satversmes 100. pant\u0101, 1950. gada 4.&nbsp;novembra Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu un pamatbr\u012bv\u012bbu konvencijas 10. pant\u0101 un ANO 1976. gada 23. marta \u201cStarptautisk\u0101 pakta par pilso\u0146u politiskaj\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m\u201d 19. panta 1. da\u013c\u0101 un 2. da\u013c\u0101 noteikt\u0101s ties\u012bbas uz savu uzskatu, izteiksmes br\u012bv\u012bbu, br\u012bv\u012bbu mekl\u0113t, sa\u0146emt un izplat\u012bt visu veidu inform\u0101cijas un idejas, neatkar\u012bgi no robe\u017e\u0101m mutiski, rakstiski, druk\u0101jot, vai m\u0101ksliniecisk\u0101s izpausmes form\u0101s, vai ar\u012b ar jebkuru inform\u0101cijas l\u012bdzek\u013cu pal\u012bdz\u012bbu p\u0113c savas izv\u0113les.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>2016. gada 25. febru\u0101ra eksperta \u0112riks Tre\u013ca atzinumu \/2. s\u0113j. 227.- 246. lietas lapa\/. No eksperta atzinuma secin\u0101jumiem secin\u0101ms, ka analiz\u0113tie teksti interneta vietn\u0113 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a> kopum\u0101 v\u0113rt\u0113jami <a>k\u0101 apzin\u0101ti v\u0113rsti uz nacion\u0101l\u0101 naida vai nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu, bet raksti: <\/a>\u201c16.marts Krievu un \u017e\u012bdu asinsdarbi nekad netiks piedoti\u201d un \u201cParaz\u012btisk\u0101 prezidenta B\u0113rzi\u0146a \u201cgai\u0161redz\u012bba\u201d publiski (raksti ir pieejami neierobe\u017eotam Interneta lietot\u0101ju lokam vis\u0101 pasaul\u0113) aicina r\u012bkoties \u0101rpus Latvijas Republikas Satversm\u0113 nostiprin\u0101tai k\u0101rt\u012bbai, un vardarb\u012bgi g\u0101zt valsts varu, k\u0101 ar\u012b veikt prettiesisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas pret pie varas eso\u0161iem politi\u0137iem- prettiesiski non\u0101v\u0113t vi\u0146us, pak\u0101rot, k\u0101 ar\u012b draud ar sodu.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Dro\u0161\u012bbas policijai <a>(\u0161obr\u012bd- Valsts Dro\u0161\u012bbas dienests) <\/a>p\u0101rs\u016bt\u012bto Izra\u0113las v\u0113stniec\u012bbas R\u012bg\u0101 e-pasta v\u0113stuli. \/1. s\u0113j. 189.- 193. lietas lapa\/ No \u0100rlietu ministrijas v\u0113stules Dro\u0161\u012bbas policijas priek\u0161niekam J.Reinikam izriet, ka 2012. gada 12. apr\u012bl\u012b \u0100rlietu ministrija no Izra\u0113las v\u0113stniec\u012bbas R\u012bg\u0101 sa\u0146\u0113ma s\u016bdz\u012bbu, ka interneta vietn\u0113 www.tautastribunals.eu public\u0113t\u0101 inform\u0101cija ir v\u0113rsta uz rasu naida kurin\u0101\u0161anu. \u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 min\u0113to, \u0100rlietu ministrija l\u016bdz izv\u0113rt\u0113t, vai \u0161aj\u0101 interneta vietn\u0113 ievietot\u0101 inform\u0101cija nesatur Krimin\u0101llikuma 78.&nbsp;pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 nozieguma sast\u0101va paz\u012bmes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Latvijas Valsts Prezidenta kancelejas p\u0113c piekrit\u012bbas Dro\u0161\u012bbas policijai (\u0161obr\u012bd- Valsts Dro\u0161\u012bbas dienests) p\u0101rs\u016bt\u012bto Latvijas Universit\u0101tes profesora Andreja Rubina e-pasta v\u0113stuli. \/2. s\u0113j. 50.- 53.lietas lapa\/. No min\u0113t\u0101s e-pasta v\u0113stules izriet, ka A. Rubins LR varas p\u0101rst\u0101vjiem jaut\u0101, k\u0101 vi\u0146i pie\u013cauj, ka Latvij\u0101 tiek izplat\u012bta un ir visiem pieejama www.tautastribunals.eu m\u0101jas lapa, kur\u0101 V\u0101cij\u0101 dz\u012bvojo\u0161s Linards Granti\u0146\u0161, izplata aicin\u0101jumus sod\u012bt ar da\u017e\u0101diem soda m\u0113riem, ieskaitot n\u0101ves sodu, Latvijas Republikas pilso\u0146us. A. Rubins uzskata, ka varas iest\u0101d\u0113m ir j\u0101dara viss, lai \u0161\u0101da m\u0101jas lapa tiktu sl\u0113gta. No min\u0113t\u0101s v\u0113stules secin\u0101ms, ka L. Granti\u0146a publiskotie raksti ir ar pla\u0161u aizsk\u0101rumu.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Uzskatu, ka R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa Spriedum\u0101 ir k\u013c\u016bdaini sniegusi v\u0113rt\u0113jumu l\u0113mum\u0101 par nodo\u0161anu tiesai nor\u0101d\u012bto ekspertu atzinumiem, nor\u0101dot, ka ekspertu atzinumi ir v\u0113rt\u0113jami k\u0101 personas, kurai ir augst\u0101k\u0101 juridisk\u0101 izgl\u012bt\u012bba viedoklis. Uzskatu, ka saska\u0146\u0101 Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 130.&nbsp;panta pras\u012bb\u0101m, pirmstiesas izmekl\u0113\u0161an\u0101 procesa virz\u012bt\u0101ji pamatoti I.&nbsp;Kronbergai un \u0112. Tre\u013cam uzdeva veikt ekspert\u012bzi. Procesa virz\u012bt\u0101ji, pieaicinot I.&nbsp;Kronbergu &nbsp;un E.&nbsp;Tre\u013cu k\u0101 ekspert\u012bzes izdar\u012bt\u0101ju, iev\u0113roja priek\u0161noteikumu \u2013 izraudz\u012bties lietprat\u0113ju, p\u0101rliecinoties par pieaicin\u0101t\u0101 eksperta kompetenci. \u0160\u0101das pras\u012bbas izraugoties ekspertu, kur\u0161 nestr\u0101d\u0101 ekspert\u012b\u017eu iest\u0101d\u0113, nostiprin\u0101tas Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 34. panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un 202. panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101. Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 34. panta pirm\u0101 da\u013ca noteic, ka procesa virz\u012bt\u0101js var pieaicin\u0101t un ar l\u0113mumu uzdot ekspert\u012bzi veikt personai, kura nav ekspert\u012b\u017eu iest\u0101des eksperts, bet kuras zin\u0101\u0161anas un praktisk\u0101 pieredze ir pietiekama ekspert\u012bzes izdar\u012b\u0161anai. Savuk\u0101rt no Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 202. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas izriet, ka procesa virz\u012bt\u0101js izraug\u0101s lietprat\u0113ju un p\u0101rliecin\u0101s par vi\u0146a kompetenci. Izv\u0113rt\u0113jot liet\u0101 eso\u0161\u0101s zi\u0146as par I.&nbsp;Kronbergas un E. Tre\u013ca izgl\u012bt\u012bbu un praktisko pieredzi uzskatu, ka ekspertu atzinumi atbilst Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 203. panta pirm\u0101s un otr\u0101s da\u013cas pras\u012bb\u0101m, un \u0161\u0101das zi\u0146as par faktiem atz\u012bstamas par pie\u013caujam\u0101m un pier\u0101d\u012b\u0161an\u0101 izmantojam\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atbilsto\u0161i Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 130. panta pras\u012bb\u0101m uzskatu, ka izmekl\u0113t\u0101js pirmstiesas izmekl\u0113\u0161an\u0101 pamatoti uzdeva sniegt atzinumu Latvijas Republikas Ties\u012bbsarga Tiesisk\u0101s vienl\u012bdz\u012bbas noda\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101jai \u0160arlotei B\u0113rzi\u0146ai. No Ties\u012bbsarga likuma norm\u0101m izriet, ka ties\u012bbsarga pamatfunkcija ir valsts varas \u012bsteno\u0161anas uzraudz\u012bba un cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bba (Sen\u0101ta 2007. gada 14. decembra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr. SKA &#8211; 679\/2007, A7021807\/12, 9. punkts). Pildot likum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s funkcijas, ties\u012bbsargs sekm\u0113 vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes principa iev\u0113ro\u0161anu un jebk\u0101das diskrimin\u0101cijas nov\u0113r\u0161anu. Savuk\u0101rt \u012bstenojot Ties\u012bbsarga likuma 12. pant\u0101 noteiktos uzdevumus, ties\u012bbsargs savus secin\u0101jumus par konkr\u0113to jaut\u0101jumu ietver atzinuma un ieteikuma form\u0101. No min\u0113t\u0101 izriet, ka ties\u012bbsargs k\u0101 Saeimas apstiprin\u0101ta amatpersona ir pilnvarots pild\u012bt Ties\u012bbsarga likum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s funkcijas un uzdevumus, kas ir v\u0113rsti uz valsts varas \u012bsteno\u0161anas uzraudz\u012bbu un cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbu. Savuk\u0101rt tiesu varas uzdevums ir g\u0101d\u0101t par to, lai, sprie\u017eot tiesu, tiktu nodro\u0161in\u0101ta visp\u0101r\u0113jo ties\u012bbu principu, Satversmes normu, Latvijai saisto\u0161o starptautisko l\u012bgumu, likumu un citu ties\u012bbu aktu \u012bsteno\u0161ana, k\u0101 ar\u012b tiktu aizsarg\u0101tas cilv\u0113ka ties\u012bbas un br\u012bv\u012bbas (Satversmes tiesas 2007. gada 18. oktobra sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr. 2007-03-01 26. punkts). Saska\u0146\u0101 ar \u201cTies\u012bbsarga likuma\u201d 11. panta 2. punkt\u0101 noteikto ties\u012bbsarga funkcij\u0101s ietilpst sekm\u0113t vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes principa iev\u0113ro\u0161anu un jebk\u0101da veida diskrimin\u0101cijas nov\u0113r\u0161anu, l\u012bdz ar to \u0160. B\u0113rzi\u0146ai bija likum\u012bgs pamata sniegt atzinumu\/viedokli liet\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Uzskatu, ka liet\u0101 nepast\u0101v \u0161aubas par L. Granti\u0146a vainu, jo L. Granti\u0146\u0161 apzin\u0101j\u0101s, ka, ievietojot rakstus interneta vietn\u0113<a href=\"http:\/\/www.tautastribunals.eu\">www.tautastribunals.eu<\/a>, \u0161\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 ievietot\u0101 inform\u0101cija b\u016bs pieejama neierobe\u017eotam personu skaitam. Krimin\u0101llikum\u0101 78. pant\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma objekt\u012bvo pusi veido darb\u012bbas, kas v\u0113rstas uz nacion\u0101la, etniska vai rasu naida un nesatic\u012bbas izrais\u012b\u0161anu. Lai izv\u0113rt\u0113tu, vai izteikumu smagums ir sasniedzis pak\u0101pi, kas k\u016bda uz naidu un par kuru paredzama krimin\u0101latbild\u012bba, ir j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, k\u0101d\u0101 politisk\u0101 un soci\u0101l\u0101 kontekst\u0101 izteikumi tiek pausti un izplat\u012bti, izteikumu saturu un formu, publiskuma m\u0113rogu. Ir atz\u012bstams, kas ar\u012b apstiprin\u0101s ar ekspertu atzinumiem\/viedok\u013ciem, ka neitr\u0101lam rakstu las\u012bt\u0101jam, k\u0101 ar\u012b past\u0101v\u012bgajiem las\u012bt\u0101jiem raksti rad\u012bja priek\u0161statu, ka krievu un ebreju taut\u012bbas cilv\u0113ki nav cilv\u0113ki un tie ir j\u0101izn\u012bcina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Iev\u0113rojot augst\u0101k min\u0113to tiesa liet\u0101 ir veikusi k\u013c\u016bdainu ieg\u016bto pier\u0101d\u012bjumu nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu, atbilsto\u0161i noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma apst\u0101k\u013ciem sniegusi k\u013c\u016bdainu un nepamatotu L. Granti\u0146a subjekt\u012bv\u0101s puses nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu, kas novedis pie nelikum\u012bga sprieduma pie\u0146em\u0161anas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pirm\u0101s instances tiesa nav nov\u0113rt\u0113jusi visus pier\u0101d\u012bjumus kopum\u0101 un savstarp\u0113j\u0101 sakar\u012bb\u0101, k\u0101 ar\u012b pier\u0101d\u012bjumu v\u0113rt\u0113jums neatbilst Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma pras\u012bb\u0101m, t\u0101dej\u0101di tiesas spriedums neatbilst Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 511. panta otr\u0101s da\u013cas pras\u012bb\u0101m, jo nav tiesisks un pamatots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 visu iepriek\u0161 min\u0113to uzskatu, ka \u0161\u0101ds tiesas Spriedums nav atz\u012bstams par tiesisku un pamatotu un tas neatbilst Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 511., 512., 527. pantu pras\u012bb\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jauni pier\u0101d\u012bjumi apel\u0101cijas instances ties\u0101 netiek pieteikti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101, ka R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesa nepamatoti noraid\u012bja l\u016bgumu par ekspertu I.&nbsp;Kronbergas, \u0160.&nbsp;B\u0113rzi\u0146as un E. Tre\u013ca aicin\u0101\u0161anu uz tiesas s\u0113di, l\u016bdzu nor\u0101d\u012bt\u0101s personas uzaicin\u0101t uz tiesas s\u0113di.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pamatojoties uz iepriek\u0161 min\u0113to un saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 549. pantu, 550.&nbsp;panta pirmo da\u013cu, 551. panta pirmo un otro da\u013cu, 552. pantu, 563. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 2.&nbsp;punktu,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>l\u016bdzu:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol type=\"1\">\n<li>Pie\u0146emt krimin\u0101llietu izties\u0101\u0161anai apel\u0101cijas k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 mutv\u0101rdu proces\u0101.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Atcelt piln\u012bb\u0101 R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas tiesas 2023. gada 2. oktobra spriedumu krimin\u0101lliet\u0101 11840002212.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Tais\u012bt jaunu spriedumu un atz\u012bt par vain\u012bgu Linardu Granti\u0146u, dzimu\u0161u 1950. gada 21. novembr\u012b, p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otr\u0101s da\u013cas (noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums izdar\u012bts 2012. gada 14. mart\u0101) <a>un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 6 ( se\u0161iem) m\u0113ne\u0161iem<\/a>, p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otr\u0101s da\u013cas ( noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums izdar\u012bts 2012. gada 28.&nbsp;mart\u0101) un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 6 ( se\u0161iem) &nbsp;m\u0113ne\u0161iem, p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 78.&nbsp;panta otr\u0101s da\u013cas ( noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums izdar\u012bts 2012. gada 6. apr\u012bl\u012b) un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 6 ( se\u0161iem) &nbsp;m\u0113ne\u0161iem, p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 78. panta otr\u0101s da\u013cas (&nbsp;noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums izdar\u012bts 2012.&nbsp;gada 23.&nbsp;j\u016blij\u0101) un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 6 ( se\u0161iem) m\u0113ne\u0161iem, p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 81.&nbsp;panta ( noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums izdar\u012bts 2012. gada 14. mart\u0101) un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 6 ( se\u0161iem) &nbsp;m\u0113ne\u0161iem, p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 81. panta ( noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums izdar\u012bts 2012. gada 23. j\u016blij\u0101) un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 6 ( se\u0161iem) m\u0113ne\u0161iem.<strong> <\/strong>Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101llikuma 50. panta tre\u0161o da\u013cu gal\u012bgo sodu noteikt p\u0113c noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu kop\u012bbas, da\u013c\u0113ji saskaitot noteiktos sodus un sod\u012bt ar br\u012bv\u012bbas at\u0146em\u0161anu uz 1 (vienu) gadu un 6 (se\u0161iem) m\u0113ne\u0161iem. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101llikuma 55. panta pirmo da\u013cu sodu noteikt nosac\u012bti ar p\u0101rbaudes laiku uz 1 ( vienu) gadu un 6 ( se\u0161iem) m\u0113ne\u0161iem.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>R\u012bgas P\u0101rdaugavas prokurat\u016bras<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>virsprokurora vietniece, prokurore &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Iluta Papsujevi\u010da&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DOKUMENTS IR ELEKTRONISKI PARAKST\u012aTS AR DRO\u0160U ELEKTRONISKO PARAKSTU UN SATUR LAIKA Z\u012aMOGU<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<div class=\"video-container\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"\u201cHi\u0113nu biznesa projekts\u201d - nevis gr\u0101mata, bet aps\u016bdz\u012bba. Unik\u0101la iesp\u0113ja katram PA\u0160AM visu saprast.\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/uIPZovCepBo?start=70&#038;feature=oembed&#038;wmode=opaque\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kas tad ir \u0161\u012b prokurore Iluta Papsujevi\u010da ? T\u0101 pati Iluta Saul\u012bte vien ir, par kuru paskaidrots jau pirms gadiem \u0161aj\u0101 vietn\u0113. \u0160eit j\u016bs redzat, cik uztraukusies ir \u0161\u012b saul\u012bte: Ja izlas\u012bj\u0101t, tad saprat\u0101t&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":65203,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65513"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=65513"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65513\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65523,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65513\/revisions\/65523"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/65203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=65513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=65513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=65513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}