{"id":64296,"date":"2023-05-07T13:50:34","date_gmt":"2023-05-07T10:50:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=64296"},"modified":"2023-05-07T14:44:09","modified_gmt":"2023-05-07T11:44:09","slug":"juristi-zids-levits-un-glumais-karins-turpina-1940-gada-iesakto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=64296","title":{"rendered":"Juristi. \u017d\u012bds Levits un glumais Kari\u0146\u0161 turpina 1940. gad\u0101 ies\u0101kto !"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

juristu grupa <zemgale80@mail.ru><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Labdien.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u017d\u012bdietes un hahola-R\u012bgas<\/strong> komjaunie\u0161a Borisa Baibakova<\/strong> kopra\u017eojums-Latvijas <\/strong>zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Jurijs Baibakovs <\/strong>reider\u0113 Latvijas<\/strong> uz\u0146\u0113mums ar pervers\u0101 peredasta \u0123ener\u0101lprokutora Stuk\u0101na <\/strong>vispus\u012bgu atbalstu. Komunistu un bo\u013c\u0161eviku p\u0113cn\u0101c\u0113ji turpina 1940.gad\u0101, 1949.gad\u0101 ies\u0101kto ar \u017e\u012bda Levita<\/strong> un glum\u0101 Kari\u0146a <\/strong>atbalstu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Varb\u016bt varat uzrakst\u012bt da\u017eus teikumus sav\u0101 vietn\u0113, Latvij\u0101 soros\u012bdu pakalpi\u0146i<\/strong> neuzdro\u0161in\u0101sies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LRTT<\/p>\n\n\n\n

04.015.2023 sa\u0146\u0113mu \u0161\u0101da veida e- pastu.<\/strong> Bija ar\u012b tiesas l\u0113mumi, kurus \u0161eit nepublic\u0113\u0161u(iz\u0146emot vienu, lai mazliet “iebrauktu” \u0161aj\u0101 valsts atbalst\u012btaj\u0101 noziegum\u0101)<\/em>, bet tikai pavadv\u0113stuli, p\u0113c kuras varam ar\u012b piln\u012bb\u0101 orient\u0113ties par LIETAS B\u016aT\u012aBU.<\/strong> \u0160\u012b v\u0113stule ar\u012b nor\u0101da: k\u0101 tiek izn\u012bcin\u0101ta Latvija<\/strong>, proti, t\u0101s industri\u0101l\u0101 att\u012bst\u012bba, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 latvie\u0161iem j\u0101mekl\u0113 darbs un patv\u0113rums \u0101rpus Latvijas<\/strong>. T\u0101 patie\u0161\u0101m ir 1940. gada ies\u0101kt\u0101 politika- t\u0101s turpin\u0101jums. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

V\u0113stul\u0113 ir uzsv\u0113rtas “nacion\u0101l\u0101s pieder\u012bbas<\/strong>“, kas neb\u016bt nav nosod\u0101ms. To, ka Latvij\u0101 <\/strong>pie teik\u0161anas ir kriev\u017e\u012bdu haz\u0101ru mafija,<\/strong> visiem pamaz\u0101m jau k\u013c\u016bst skaidrs. \u0160\u012bs mafijas uzdevumi tiek diri\u0123\u0113ti no cionistu citadeles- Izra\u0113las<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u0101 visa ir apzin\u0101ta genoc\u012bdiska politika tie\u0161i pret latvie\u0161u etnosu !<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To uzvar\u0113t, pie pa\u0161reiz\u0113jiem apst\u0101k\u013ciem, nav iesp\u0113jams, bet cer\u012bbas ir lielas sakar\u0101 ar karu Ukrain\u0101,<\/strong> kuru izrais\u012bja \u0161\u012b pati haz\u0101ru banda ar Putinu<\/strong> priek\u0161gal\u0101. Ukrai\u0146u uzvara<\/strong> ir \u0161ai mafijai n\u0101ves spriedums. Pasaule beidzot var\u0113s no \u0161iem \u0123en\u0113tiskajiem atkritumiem atbr\u012bvoties. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kas attiecas uz Juri Stuk\u0101nu<\/strong>: vi\u0146\u0161 ir cionistu darbonis,- latvie\u0161u tautas bende. Par vi\u0146u jau \u0161aj\u0101 vietn\u0113 ir rakst\u012bts. Vi\u0146\u0161 bija viens no galvenajiem “\u010dekas maisu”<\/strong> selekcion\u0101riem. Galvenais \u0161aj\u0101 cionistu varz\u0101 ir “m\u016b\u017e\u012bgais \u017e\u012bds” K. Kangeris<\/strong>. Izlas\u012bt no \u0161iem maisiem “vajadz\u012bgos”<\/strong>, bet atst\u0101t tajos “izredz\u0113tos”<\/strong>, ir sabiedr\u012bbas naido\u0161anas ETALONS<\/strong> ! \u0160o izdzimumu noslepkavotais v\u0113sturnieks- profesors Indulis Ronis<\/strong> nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka Kangeris<\/a><\/strong>(atv\u0113rt) <\/em>ir Izra\u0113las <\/strong>cilv\u0113ks, kur\u0161 tai nodevis Latvijas nosl\u0113pumus <\/strong>un ar\u012b tos pa\u0161us “\u010dekas maisus” <\/strong>! <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Uz foto skat\u0101mie nav pieskait\u0101mi cilv\u0113ku rases p\u0101rst\u0101vjiem- vi\u0146i ir s\u0101taniski izdzimumi <\/a>(atver un lasi par de\u0123ener\u0101tu Muci\u0146u)<\/em> ar t\u0101 saucamo “lieko hromosomu”<\/strong>. Bet, kas attiecas uz \u0161o ANON\u012aMO juristu grupu<\/strong>: Aizdomas rada tas, ka tiek piemin\u0113ts Soross- soros\u012bdi<\/strong>. Tas ir cionistu- kriev\u017e\u012bdu j\u0101jamzirdzi\u0146\u0161, kas kalpo pa\u0161u veikto noziegumu uzgr\u016b\u0161anai \u0161im nabaga banku af\u0113ristam. Vai neesam iev\u0113roju\u0161i, ka jebrejs A. Lembergs<\/strong> nevar pateikt nevienu rindkopu, kur\u0101 neb\u016btu piemin\u0113ts Soross<\/strong> ? Tikai atkl\u0101ts paliek jaut\u0101jums: vai 14 Lemberga<\/strong> tiesas procesa liecinieku n\u0101v\u0113 ar\u012b vainojams Soross<\/strong> ? Un v\u0113l: ir interasats e- pasts, kas satur divus mums visiem “n\u012bstos” <\/strong>burtus-ru<\/strong>(juristu grupa <zemgale80@mail.ru>)<\/em>! Varb\u016bt \u0161\u012b JURISTU GRUPA<\/strong> var\u0113tu sevi “st\u0101d\u012bt priek\u0161\u0101” <\/strong>tautai ?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
\u0160\u012b dra\u0146\u0137u banda- visi k\u0101 viens, ir peln\u012bju\u0161i ASM !<\/mark><\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0122ener\u0101lprokurors Juris Stuk\u0101ns pal\u012bdz zv\u0113rin\u0101tam advok\u0101tam Jurijam Baibakovam reider\u0113t k\u0101rt\u0113jo uz\u0146\u0113mumu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vissavien\u012bbas \u013be\u0146ina komunistisk\u0101s jaunatnes savien\u012bbas (V\u013bKJS) p\u0101rst\u0101vja-komjaunie\u0161a, R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas komitejas sekret\u0101ra, R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas komitejas otr\u0101 sekret\u0101ra, kred\u012btiest\u0101des \u201dSl\u0101vu (Saules) banka\u201d l\u012bdzdibin\u0101t\u0101ja Borisa Baibakova d\u0113ls \u2013 1983.gad\u0101 dzimu\u0161ais zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Jurijs Baibakovs gadiem ilgi nodarbojas ar uz\u0146\u0113mumu reider\u0113\u0161anu, naudas izspie\u0161anu, naudas izkr\u0101p\u0161anu tiesas ce\u013c\u0101, izkr\u0101pjamo naudas l\u012bdzek\u013cu legaliz\u0113\u0161anu caur tiesu spriedumiem civilliet\u0101s,  izmantojot sa\u0146emto \u201cza\u013co gaismu\u201d no valsts policijas un LR prokurat\u016bras puses. M\u0113r\u0137a sasnieg\u0161anas pa\u0101trin\u0101\u0161anai Jurijs Baibakovs organiz\u0113 pas\u016bt\u012bjuma krimin\u0101lprocesus valsts policij\u0101 pret reider\u0113jamo uz\u0146\u0113mumu \u012bpa\u0161niekiem un amatperson\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ir v\u0113rts piev\u0113rst uzman\u012bbu vienai, \u0161obr\u012bd no Jurija Baibakova puses \u012bstenojamai epizodei Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma, kas dibin\u0101ts 2000.gad\u0101, reider\u0113\u0161an\u0101. Uz\u0146\u0113muma reider\u0113\u0161an\u0101 k\u0101rt\u0113jo reizi piedal\u0101s valsts policija un \u0161oreiz ar\u012b LR \u0123ener\u0101lprokurat\u016bras \u0123ener\u0101lprokurors Juris Stuk\u0101ns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u012asi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2014.gada 01.j\u016bnij\u0101 starp Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mumu un R\u012bgas uz\u0146\u0113mumu Smart TV tika nosl\u0113gts sadarb\u012bbas l\u012bgums, kura ietvaros SIA Smart TV pieg\u0101d\u0101 pakalpojumus Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mumam. 2019.gada 20.j\u016bnij\u0101 SIA Smat TV tika pievienota pie R\u012bgas SIA Netvision. 2018.gada 01.novembr\u012b SIA Smart TV pazi\u0146oja Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mumam par pakalpojuma cenas paaugstin\u0101\u0161anu l\u012bdz 3900 euro m\u0113nes\u012b. Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mums cenas paaugstin\u0101jumam nav devis piekri\u0161anu, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 2020.gada 07.apr\u012bl\u012b SIA Netvision iesniedza Vidzemes ties\u0101 pras\u012bbas pieteikumu civilliet\u0101 par pirms\u0161\u0137ietam\u0101 par\u0101da 67 856.41 euro apm\u0113r\u0101 piedzi\u0146u no Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma par labu pras\u012bt\u0101jai SIA Netvision. Pras\u012bt\u0101ju SIA Netvision p\u0101rst\u0101v b\u0113d\u012bgi slavens zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Jurijs Baibakovs. Pras\u012bba par par\u0101dapiedzi\u0146u tika apmierin\u0101ta, spriedums ir st\u0101jies likum\u012bgaj\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101. Mekl\u0113jot risin\u0101jumus, Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mums iesniedza ties\u0101 \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pieteikumu, kuru tiesa apmierin\u0101ja. Zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Jurijs Baibakovs, rea\u0123\u0113jot uz \u0161\u0101du notikumu att\u012bst\u012bbu, iesniedza iesniegumu LR \u0123ener\u0101lprokurat\u016br\u0101, l\u016bdzot \u0123ener\u0101lprokuroru Juri Stuk\u0101nu iesniegt prokurat\u016bras protestu. \u0122ener\u0101lrokurat\u016bra apmierin\u0101ja zv\u0113rin\u0101ta advok\u0101ta Jurija Baibakova iesniegumu, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 \u0123ener\u0101lprokurors Juris Stuk\u0101ns LR Augst\u0101k\u0101 ties\u0101 iesniedza prokurora protestu. 2022.gada 21.decembr\u012b, izskatot \u0123ener\u0101lprokurora Jura Stuk\u0101na iesniegto protestu, LR Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa nol\u0113ma atcelt Vidzemes rajona tiesas 2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu \u0101rpus tiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bubas liet\u0101 C71175622. K\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 2023.gada 19.janv\u0101r\u012b Vidzemes rajona tiesa C\u0113s\u012bs noraid\u012bja Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma pieteikumu par \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kuma pl\u0101na apstiprin\u0101\u0161anu 2022.gada 28. marta redakcij\u0101 un izbeidza tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101. Kop\u0101 ar \u012bstenot\u0101m aktivit\u0101t\u0113m Jurijs Baibakovs R\u012bg\u0101 uzs\u0101cis krimin\u0101lprocesu Nr.15170000823  p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 215.1 panta (Tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa noteikumu p\u0101rk\u0101p\u0161ana) 1. da\u013cas (Par tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa izmanto\u0161anu nol\u016bk\u0101 izvair\u012bties no saist\u012bbu izpildes).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Konkr\u0113ti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2020.gada 07.apr\u012bl\u012b Vidzemes rajona tiesa Al\u016bksn\u0113 sa\u0146\u0113ma Jurija Baibakova R\u012bgas klienta SIA Netvision uzdevum\u0101 uzrakst\u012bto pras\u012bbas pieteikumu civilliet\u0101 C71202120. Lietas b\u016bt\u012bba \u2013 pirms\u0161\u0137ietami neeksist\u0113jo\u0161\u0101 par\u0101da 67 856.41 euro apm\u0113r\u0101 piedzi\u0146a (Jurija Baibakova specializ\u0101cija). Izties\u0101jam\u0101 civilliet\u0101 ir notiku\u0161as vair\u0101kas tiesas s\u0113des, tika iesniegtas vair\u0101kas blakus s\u016bdz\u012bbas, apel\u0101cijas s\u016bdz\u012bba, kas\u0101cijas s\u016bdz\u012bba. 2022.gada 14.septembr\u012b Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ts pie\u0146\u0113ma nol\u0113mumu atteikt ierosin\u0101t kas\u0101cijas tiesved\u012bbu. K\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 celt\u0101 pras\u012bba tika apmierin\u0101ta, tiesas l\u0113mums 2022.gada 14.septembr\u012b ir st\u0101jies likum\u012bgaj\u0101 sp\u0113k\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Par\u0101dniece, rea\u0123\u0113jot uz faktu, ka tai ir iest\u0101jies pien\u0101kums samaks\u0101t piespriesto naudas summu 82 037.68 euro apm\u0113r\u0101 (2021.gada 03.septembra spriedums civilliet\u0101 C71202120), konstat\u0113jot nesp\u0113ju izpild\u012bt spriedumu, 2022.gada 08.mart\u0101 iesniedza Vidzemes rajona ties\u0101 pieteikumu (C71175622) par \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesu. 2022.gada 29.mart\u0101 tika ierosin\u0101ts \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2023.gada 19.janv\u0101ra Vidzems rajona tiesas spriedum\u0101 liet\u0101 C71175622 (noraid\u012bt pieteikumu par \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kuma pl\u0101na apstiprin\u0101\u0161anu 2022. gada 28. marta redakcij\u0101 un izbeigt tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101) konstat\u0113jams, ka kreditora p\u0101rst\u0101vis Jurijs Baibakovs pan\u0101cis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.          Krimin\u0101lprocesa uzs\u0101k\u0161anu pret reider\u0113jam\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma amatperson\u0101m. Krimin\u0101lprocess Nr. 15170000823 ir uzs\u0101kts p\u0113c Krimin\u0101llikuma 215.1 panta 1. da\u013cas. Procesa virz\u012bt\u0101js ir Valsts policijas R\u012bgas re\u0123iona p\u0101rvaldes Krimin\u0101lpolicijas p\u0101rvaldes 3. biroja 3. noda\u013ca.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2022.gada 21.decembra LR Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mum\u0101 civilliet\u0101 C71175622 konstat\u0113jams, ka kreditora p\u0101rst\u0101vis Jurijs Baibakovs pan\u0101cis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2.          \u0122ener\u0101lprokurora protesta iesnieg\u0161anu LR Augst\u0101k\u0101 ties\u0101 par Vidzemes rajona tiesas 2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa liet\u0101 C71175622.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u0101 nav pirm\u0101 epizode, kad uz\u0146\u0113mumu reid\u0113r\u0113\u0161an\u0101 Jurija Baibakova komand\u0101 piedal\u0101s valsts policijas, LR prokurat\u016bras, LR Tieslietu ministrijas amatpersonas (tiesne\u0161i).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Iesp\u0113jams t\u0101 ir pirm\u0101 epizode, kad uz\u0146\u0113muma reider\u0113\u0161an\u0101 organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas pus\u0113 person\u012bgi iesaist\u012bjies \u0123ener\u0101lprokurors Juris Stuk\u0101ns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kop\u0113j\u0101s ainas sapra\u0161anai ir v\u0113rts iepaz\u012bties ar dokumentiem:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.          2021.gada 03.septembra Vidzemes rajona tiesas Al\u016bksn\u0113 spriedums civilliet\u0101 C71202120 par celt\u0101 pras\u012bbas apmierin\u0101\u0161anu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2.          2022.gada 21.decembra LR Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mums civilliet\u0101 C71175622.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3.          2023.gada 19.janv\u0101ra Vidzemes rajona tiesas C\u0113s\u012bs l\u0113mums civilliet\u0101 C71175622.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Piez\u012bmes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pielikum\u0101 Nr.2 (2022.gada 21.decembra LR Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mums civilliet\u0101 C71175622) atrodama inform\u0101cija (01.lpp, [5]), ka reider\u0113jam\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma \u012bpa\u0161nieki pie\u0146\u0113ma Jurija Baibakova priek\u0161likumu ievad\u012bt reider\u0113jam\u0101 Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 dal\u012bbniekos Jurija Baibakova p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113to uz\u0146\u0113mumu SIA Netvision, palielinot pamatkapit\u0101lu ar 14 kapit\u0101la da\u013c\u0101m aizst\u0101jot SIA Netvision ties\u0101 apmierin\u0101to pras\u012bbas summu. Konstat\u0113jams, ka izties\u0101jam\u0101 civillieta C71202120 vairs nav civillieta par par\u0101da piedzi\u0146u, bet lietform\u0101ta reiderisks uzbrukums Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mumam ar m\u0113r\u0137i to p\u0101r\u0146emt. K\u0101 var saprast no tiesved\u012bbu dokumentiem \u2013 Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma \u012bpa\u0161um\u0101 ir pla\u0161s kabe\u013cu t\u012bkls, kas izvietots daudzdz\u012bvok\u013cu dz\u012bvojamo m\u0101ju k\u0101p\u0146u telp\u0101s Valmier\u0101 un Valmieras novad\u0101. Pa kabe\u013cu t\u012bkliem tiek pieg\u0101d\u0101ti telev\u012bzijas un interneta pakalpojumi. R\u012bgas uz\u0146\u0113muma SIA Netvision pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anai Valmiera un Valmieras novad\u0101 ir nepiecie\u0161ams iepriek\u0161 izb\u016bv\u0113ts un \u0161obr\u012bd ekspluat\u0113ts datu p\u0101rraides kabe\u013cu t\u012bkls ar klientu portfeli \u2013 t\u0101tad Jurija Baibakova un SIA Netvision amatpersonu un dal\u012bbnieku r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 konstat\u0113jamas visas \u010detras oblig\u0101tas noziedz\u012bga nodar\u012bjuma sast\u0101va paz\u012bmes Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma reider\u0113\u0161an\u0101, bet… krimin\u0101lprocess ir uzs\u0101kts R\u012bg\u0101 tie\u0161i pret Valmieras reider\u0113jam\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma amatperson\u0101m un \u012bpa\u0161niekiem. Par Jurija Baibakova p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113to SIA Netvision zin\u0101ms, ka t\u0101 dal\u012bbnieki un amatpersonas ir 1980.gad\u0101 dzimu\u0161ie Konstant\u012bns Getmans un Romans \u0160atilovs. 2021.gad\u0101 SIA Netvision apgroz\u012bja 2 507 219 euro, nopelnot 965 516 euro \u2013 t\u0101tad Jurija Baibakova un t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101to \u201cpas\u016bt\u012bjumu galdu\u201d pakalpojumu apmaksai uz\u0146\u0113mumam nauda ir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parasti visi bez iz\u0146\u0113muma iesniegumi valsts policij\u0101 par Jurija Baibakova konstat\u0113jamiem noziedz\u012bgiem nodar\u012bjumiem, tiek nov\u012bz\u0113ti izskat\u012b\u0161anai valsts policijas lok\u0101los iecirk\u0146os p\u0113c iesp\u0113jamo Jurija Baibakova noziedz\u012bgo nodar\u012bjumu \u012bsteno\u0161anas vietas. Iesniegumus izskata valsts policijas viet\u0113jo iecirk\u0146u k\u0101rt\u012bbas noda\u013cas, autom\u0101tiski rakstot atteikumus, neizskatot iesniegumus Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma paredz\u0113taj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101. S\u016bdz\u012bbas par valsts policijas atteikumiem izskata viet\u0113jo prokurat\u016bru prokurori, autom\u0101tiski atrakstoties. Sh\u0113ma ir atstr\u0101d\u0101ta un gadiem ilgi perfekti darbojas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aprakst\u012btaj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 krimin\u0101lprocess uz Jurija Baibakova iesnieguma pamata pret reider\u0113jam\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma amatperson\u0101m ir uzs\u0101kts R\u012bg\u0101, ignor\u0113jot Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma noteikto par teritori\u0101lo piekrit\u012bbu (Valmiera) un potenci\u0101lo aps\u016bdz\u0113to (reider\u0113jam\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma amatpersonas) dz\u012bves vietu (Valmiera).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 aprakst\u012bto, konstat\u0113jams, ka valsts policijas R\u012bgas re\u0123iona p\u0101rvaldes Krimin\u0101lpolicijas p\u0101rvaldes (priek\u0161nieks Raimonds Kronbergs) 3. biroja 3. noda\u013ca zv\u0113rin\u0101tam advok\u0101tam Jurijam Baibakovam sniedz \u201cpas\u016bt\u012bjuma galda\u201d pakalpojumus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Piev\u0113r\u0161ama uzman\u012bba apst\u0101klim, ka krimin\u0101lprocess ir uzs\u0101kts par Tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa noteikumu p\u0101rk\u0101p\u0161anu apst\u0101k\u013cos, kad reider\u0113jamajam Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mumam nav aktu\u0101la tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa. Konstat\u0113jams krimin\u0101llikuma 15.panta 6.da\u013cas p\u0101rk\u0101pums no \u201cpas\u016bt\u012bjumu galda\u201d pakalpojuma sniedz\u0113ja – valsts policijas puses. Konkr\u0113ti KL 15.panta sest\u0101 da\u013ca nosaka: (6) Par m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu izdar\u012bt krimin\u0101lp\u0101rk\u0101pumu persona nav saucama pie krimin\u0101latbild\u012bbas. Jurijs Baibakovs jau iepriek\u0161 ir dar\u012bjis l\u012bdz\u012bgi \u2013 s\u0101cis krimin\u0101lprocesus pret person\u0101m, p\u0113c krimin\u0101lprocesu uzs\u0101k\u0161anas piln\u012bb\u0101 p\u0101rtraucot stimul\u0113t procesa virz\u012bt\u0101ju, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101, uzs\u0101ktie krimin\u0101lprocesi st\u0101v bez virz\u012bbas. Izskat\u0101s, ka ar\u012b aprakst\u0101m\u0101 epizod\u0113 nav m\u0113r\u0137a celt aps\u016bdz\u012bbu \u2013 tikai izspiest naudu un p\u0101r\u0146emt uz\u0146\u0113muma akt\u012bvus apmai\u0146\u0101 pret krimin\u0101lprocesa izbeig\u0161anu \u2013 l\u012bdz\u012bgi Jurijs Baibakovs ir dar\u012bjis iepriek\u0161.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apst\u0101klis, ka zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Jurijs Baibakovs akt\u012bvi pretojies \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pasludin\u0101\u0161anai, pier\u0101da, ka galvenais m\u0113r\u0137is nav par\u0101da piedzi\u0146a par labu SIA Netvision, bet reider\u0113jam\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma p\u0101r\u0146em\u0161ana. Likumsakar\u012bgi sagaid\u0101ms n\u0101kamais parasti primit\u012bvi dom\u0101jo\u0161\u0101 zv\u0113rin\u0101ta advok\u0101ta Jurija Baibakova solis prettiesisk\u0101 m\u0113r\u0137a sasnieg\u0161an\u0101 \u2013 maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas procesa pasludin\u0101\u0161anas pieteikuma iesnieg\u0161ana ties\u0101 ar m\u0113r\u0137i ieg\u0101d\u0101ties reider\u0113jam\u0101 Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma akt\u012bvus \u2013 telev\u012bzijas un interneta kabe\u013cu t\u012bklu k\u0101 mantas kop\u012bbu izsol\u0113 par minim\u0101lo cenu, jo interneta un telev\u012bzijas pakalpojumu kabe\u013cu t\u012bkls Valmier\u0101 un Valmieras rajon\u0101 nevienam, iz\u0146emot SIA Netvision un reider\u0113jamo Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mumu nav vajadz\u012bgs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Uz iesniegumiem par prokurora protesta iesnieg\u0161anu \u0123ener\u0101lprokurat\u016bras prokurori parasti atrakst\u0101s. Konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 apbr\u012bnojam\u0101 k\u0101rt\u0101 uz Jurija Baibakova iesniegumu rea\u0123\u0113jis \u0123ener\u0101lprokurat\u016bras \u0123ener\u0101lprokurors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0122ener\u0101lprokurora Jura Stuk\u0101na akt\u012bva iesaist\u012b\u0161an\u0101s Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma reider\u0113\u0161an\u0101 vienot\u0101 komand\u0101 ar organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas p\u0101rst\u0101vjiem liecina, ka LR prokurat\u016bras p\u0101r\u0146em\u0161ana sav\u0101 kontrol\u0113 no organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas, kura atvasin\u0101j\u0101s no 1991.gad\u0101 aizliegt\u0101s  komunistisk\u0101s partijas puses, ir nosl\u0113guma stadij\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jaut\u0101jumi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

K\u0101 valmierietis, biju\u0161ais Valmieras domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js \u2013 \u0161obr\u012bd iek\u0161lietu ministrs M\u0101ris Ku\u010dinskis rea\u0123\u0113s uz sign\u0101lu, ka Armanda Ruka vad\u012bt\u0101 valsts policija sniedz \u201cpas\u016bt\u012bjuma galda\u201d pakalpojumus organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas p\u0101rst\u0101vim \u2013 advok\u0101ta izstr\u0101d\u0101jumam Jurijam Baibakovam, sniedzot tam vispus\u012bgu atbalstu k\u0101rt\u0113j\u0101 epizod\u0113 – prettiesisk\u0101 m\u0113r\u0137a (Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113muma p\u0101r\u0146em\u0161ana) sasnieg\u0161an\u0101?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kad Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js Aigars Strupi\u0161s konstat\u0113s pamatu lemt par \u0123ener\u0101lprokurora Jura Stuk\u0101na atlai\u0161anu?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Secin\u0101jumi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Valmieras uz\u0146\u0113mums (l\u012bdz\u012bgi ka daudzi citi) tika att\u012bst\u012bts divdesmit tr\u012bs gadu garum\u0101, kam\u0113r non\u0101ca organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas uzman\u012bbas lok\u0101. \u0160\u0101di izskat\u0101s Kari\u0146a-Levita re\u017e\u012bma veiksmes st\u0101sts \u2013 \u013caut Latvijas tautai izveidot, att\u012bst\u012bt uz\u0146\u0113mumus l\u012bdz br\u012bdim, kam\u0113r tiks izlemts, konkr\u0113ti k\u0101ds organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas dal\u012bbnieks s\u0101ks uz\u0146\u0113muma p\u0101r\u0146em\u0161anu reiderisk\u0101 uzbrukuma ce\u013c\u0101 ar valsts policijas, LR prokurat\u016bras, Tieslietu ministrijas atbalstu. Likumsakar\u012bgi ir secin\u0101t, ka pamu\u013c\u0137u, kas Latvij\u0101 izveido un att\u012bsta re\u0101li str\u0101d\u0101jo\u0161us uz\u0146\u0113mumus, skaits samazin\u0101s un turpin\u0101s samazin\u0101ties \u2013 Latvijas uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 ir att\u012bst\u012btas rietumeiropas valstis, kur\u0101s \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbu iev\u0113ro\u0161ana saska\u0146\u0101 ar Satversmi nav tuk\u0161a ska\u0146a.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pielikumos izdrukas no www.tiesas.lv:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.          2021.gada 03.septembra Vidzems rajona tiesas Al\u016bksn\u0113 spriedums civilliet\u0101 C71202120 par celt\u0101 pras\u012bbas apmierin\u0101\u0161anu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2.          2022.gada 21.decembra LR Sen\u0101ta l\u0113mums civilliet\u0101 C71175622.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3.          2023.gada 19.janv\u0101ra Vidzemes rajona tiesas C\u0113s\u012bs l\u0113mums civilliet\u0101 C71175622.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

07.05.23<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ECLI:LV:AT:2022:1221.C71175622.7.LLieta Nr. C71175622, SPC-21\/2022Civillietu departaments<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Latvijas Republikas Sen\u0101ts<\/p>\n\n\n\n

L\u0112MUMS<\/p>\n\n\n\n

R\u012bg\u0101 2022.gada 21.decembr\u012b<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sen\u0101ts \u0161\u0101d\u0101 sast\u0101v\u0101:senators referents Valerijs Maksimovs,senatore Anita \u010cer\u0146avska,senators Normunds Salenieksrakstveida proces\u0101 izskat\u012bja \u0123ener\u0101lprokurora protestu par Vidzemes rajona tiesas2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu SIA ,,MIKRONET\u201d \u0101rpustiesastiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa liet\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apraksto\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca[1] <\/p>\n\n\n\n

SIA \u201eMIKRONET\u201d 2022.gada 8.mart\u0101 iesniegusi ties\u0101 pieteikumu, l\u016bdzot \u012bstenot \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesu un apstiprin\u0101t\u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kumu pl\u0101nu.[2] Ar Vidzemes rajona tiesas2022.gada 9.marta l\u0113mumu ierosin\u0101ta SIA \u201cMIKRONET\u201d lieta \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas proces\u0101.[ 3 ] Ar Vidzemes rajona tiesas2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu (nol\u0113mum\u0101 k\u013c\u016bdaini nor\u0101d\u012bts \u2013 spriedums) apmierin\u0101ts pieteikums parSIA ,,MIKRONET\u201d tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa \u012bsteno\u0161anu \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas proces\u0101 un tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kumupl\u0101na apstiprin\u0101\u0161anu.Nol\u0113mumspamatots ar \u0161\u0101diem apst\u0101k\u013ciem un argumentiem.[3.1] Par\u0101dnieces \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kumu pl\u0101ns ir saska\u0146ots ar kreditoru vair\u0101kumu. Piekri\u0161anu sniedzis kreditors\/pers. B\/, kura pamatpar\u0101ds veido 67,61 % no kop\u0113j\u0101s nenodro\u0161in\u0101to kreditoru galveno pras\u012bjumu summas, k\u0101 ar\u012b citi kreditori, kuri atbilsto\u0161iMaks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma noteikumiem nav ties\u012bgi saska\u0146ot pl\u0101nu.Valsts ie\u0146\u0113mumu dienesta piekri\u0161ana nav nepiecie\u0161ama, jo par\u0101dniece ap\u0146\u0113musies segt nodok\u013cu par\u0101du piln\u0101 apm\u0113r\u0101 un attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz t\u0101 pras\u012bjumunetiek piem\u0113rota neviena no Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 38.panta piektaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 paredz\u0113taj\u0101m metod\u0113m.[3.2] Uzraugo\u0161\u0101 persona ir p\u0101rbaud\u012bjusi kreditoru pras\u012bjumu pamatot\u012bbu un \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kumu pl\u0101nu, atz\u012bstot, katas ir izstr\u0101d\u0101ts atbilsto\u0161i Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma pras\u012bb\u0101m.[3.3] Kreditores SIA ,,NETVISION\u201d l\u016bgumi par t\u0101s pieaicin\u0101\u0161anu liet\u0101 ieinteres\u0113t\u0101s personas status\u0101, pier\u0101d\u012bjumu izpras\u012b\u0161anu un pieteikumaizskat\u012b\u0161anu mutv\u0101rdu proces\u0101 ir noraid\u0101mi.Tiesa ir izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi kreditoru iebildumus un neuzskata, ka past\u0101v nepiecie\u0161am\u012bba noteikt pieteikuma izskat\u012b\u0161anu tiesas s\u0113d\u0113. T\u0101pat j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, kaCivilprocesa likuma 45.1 noda\u013ca \u201eTiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa lietas\u201d neparedz kreditora pieaicin\u0101\u0161anu liet\u0101 par ieinteres\u0113to personu.[3.4] L\u0113mums k\u0101 nep\u0101rs\u016bdzams ir st\u0101jies sp\u0113k\u0101.[4] Par Vidzemes rajona tiesas2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu\u0123ener\u0101lprokurors iesniedzis protestu, kur\u0101 l\u016bdzis to atcelt un lietu nodot jaunaiizskat\u012b\u0161anai pirm\u0101s instances ties\u0101, nor\u0101dot \u0161\u0101dus apst\u0101k\u013cus un argumentus.[4.1] \u0100rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kumu pl\u0101n\u0101 k\u0101 kreditori nor\u0101d\u012bti \/pers. B\/, SIA ,,NETVISION\u201d, Valsts ie\u0146\u0113mumu dienests unar par\u0101dnieci saist\u012bt\u0101s personas.Piekri\u0161anu par\u0101dnieces pied\u0101v\u0101jumam dz\u0113st 74 % no galven\u0101 par\u0101da un visus blakus pras\u012bjumus sniedzis tikai \/pers. B\/, par kura pras\u012bjuma fikt\u012bvoraksturu un finansi\u0101lo sp\u0113ju izsniegt aizdevumu 167 242,76 EUR apm\u0113r\u0101 SIA ,,NETVISION\u201d k\u0101 otra liel\u0101k\u0101 kreditore ir izteikusi iebildumus.[4.2] Pirm\u0161\u0137ietami konstat\u0113jams, ka \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas process negat\u012bvi ietekm\u0113 tikai viena kreditore – SIA ,,NETVISION\u201d -intereses, par kura pras\u012bjuma pamatot\u012bbu tiek risin\u0101ts str\u012bds cit\u0101 tiesved\u012bb\u0101.Neskatoties uz to, tiesa p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jusi SIA ,,NETVISION\u201d iebildumus, k\u0101 ar\u012b nav argument\u0113jusi, k\u0101d\u0113\u013c atbilsto\u0161i Civilprocesa likuma341.6 panta 2.1 da\u013cas pras\u012bb\u0101m kreditore nebija pieaicin\u0101ma liet\u0101 k\u0101 ieinteres\u0113t\u0101 persona.Min\u0113tais nav pie\u013caujams, jo, zaud\u0113jot ties\u012bbas p\u0113c saist\u012bbas izpildes bezstr\u012bdus k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101, kreditoram tiek liegtas ar\u012b ties\u012bbas celt iebildumus savuintere\u0161u nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai.[5] SIA \u201eMIKRONET\u201d valdes loceklis \/pers. E\/2022.gada 14.decembr\u012biesniedza paskaidrojumus, nor\u0101dot, ka protests noraid\u0101ms. 2022.gada5.oktobr\u012b SIA \u201eMIKRONET\u201d dal\u012bbnieku sapulce pie\u0146\u0113ma l\u0113mumu palielin\u0101t pamatkapit\u0101lu un uz\u0146emt SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d k\u0101 jaunu dal\u012bbnieku. L\u012bdz arto SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d pras\u012bjums aizst\u0101ts ar SIA \u201eMIKRONET\u201d 14 pamatkapit\u0101la da\u013c\u0101m.Mot\u012bvu da\u013ca[6] P\u0101rbaud\u012bjis lietas materi\u0101lus un apsv\u0113ris protest\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012btos argumentus, Sen\u0101ts atz\u012bst, ka apstr\u012bd\u0113tais l\u0113mums atce\u013cams.[6.1] Viens no tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa visp\u0101r\u0113jiem principiem ir vienl\u012bdz\u012bbas princips \u2013 kreditoriem tiek dotas vien\u0101das iesp\u0113jas piedal\u012bties212.3.198.177 02.05.2023. 13:09 Anon\u012bms sist\u0113mas lietot\u0101js<\/p>\n\n\n\n

maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas proces\u0101 un sa\u0146emt savu pras\u012bjumu apmierin\u0101jumu no saist\u012bb\u0101m, kuras tie nodibin\u0101ju\u0161i ar par\u0101dnieku pirms procesa uzs\u0101k\u0161anas(Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 6.panta 2.punkts).Tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa liet\u0101s \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas proces\u0101 piem\u0113ro Civilprocesa likuma 45.1 noda\u013c\u0101 ietvertos noteikumus.Ties\u012bbu doktr\u012bn\u0101 atz\u012bts, ka lai tiesa var\u0113tu pie\u0146emt l\u0113mumu par tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa \u012bsteno\u0161anu \u0101rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas proces\u0101,tai vispirms ir j\u0101p\u0101rliecin\u0101s, vai par\u0101dnieks ir izstr\u0101d\u0101jis Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 38. un 40.pantam atbilsto\u0161u tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pas\u0101kumupl\u0101nu, k\u0101 ar\u012b, vai pl\u0101ns ir saska\u0146ots ar Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 42.panta tre\u0161aj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 min\u0113to kreditoru vair\u0101kumu (sk. Civilprocesa likuma koment\u0101ri. IIda\u013ca (29.-60.1noda\u013ca). Sagatavojis autoru kolekt\u012bvs. Prof. K.Torg\u0101na zin\u0101tniskaj\u0101 redakcij\u0101. – R\u012bga: Tiesu namu a\u0123ent\u016bra, 2012, 391.lpp.).T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di tiesai, izskatot pieteikumu, ir j\u0101izv\u0113rt\u0113 visi apst\u0101k\u013ci, kas attiecin\u0101mi uz pl\u0101na saska\u0146o\u0161anu un apstiprin\u0101\u0161anu, tostarp ar\u012b kreditoru sniegtieiebildumi un tos pamatojo\u0161ie pier\u0101d\u012bjumi.K\u0101 redzams no lietas materi\u0101liem, SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d 2022.gada 24.mart\u0101 ties\u0101 iesniegusi iebildumus par par\u0101dnieces pl\u0101nu, kuros izteiktas\u0161aubas par kreditora \/pers. B\/ finansi\u0101laj\u0101m sp\u0113j\u0101m uz cesijas l\u012bguma pamata ieg\u016bt pras\u012bjuma ties\u012bbas pret SIA \u201eMIKRONET\u201d, kas izriet no 2014.gada29.oktobra aizdevuma l\u012bguma. Iebildumiem pievienoti attiec\u012bgi pier\u0101d\u012bjumi. T\u0101pat iebildumos nor\u0101d\u012bts, ka par\u0101dnieces gada p\u0101rskat\u0101 par 2016., 2017.,2018., 2019. un 2020.gadu iek\u013cauts 2014.gada 29.oktobra \u0137\u012blas l\u012bgums (sk. lietas 62., 53., 49.lp.), ta\u010du saska\u0146\u0101 ar tiesai iesniegto pl\u0101nu par\u0101dnieceinav nodro\u0161in\u0101to kreditoru. Iebildumos ar\u012b izteikts l\u016bgums pieaicin\u0101t SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d k\u0101 ieinteres\u0113to personu lietas izskat\u012b\u0161an\u0101 un izpras\u012bt pier\u0101d\u012bjumus(sk. lietas 39 \u2013 42.lp.).Apmierinot pieteikumu, tiesa atzinusi, ka sa\u0146emtie iebildumi nav pamats pieteikuma izskat\u012b\u0161anai tiesas s\u0113d\u0113 un kreditoru pieaicin\u0101\u0161anu liet\u0101ieinteres\u0113t\u0101s personas status\u0101 nenosaka Civilprocesa likuma 45.1 noda\u013ca. Sen\u0101ts piekr\u012bt protest\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012btajam, ka tiesabez iev\u0113r\u012bbas atst\u0101jusi faktu, ka pirms\u0161\u0137ietami apstiprin\u0101tais 2022.gada 23.febru\u0101ra pl\u0101ns b\u016btiski(negat\u012bvi) ietekm\u0113 tikai vienu kreditoru, proti, SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d, kuras ties\u012bbu p\u0113c saist\u012bbas par\u0101dniece neatz\u012bst un par ko str\u012bds pras\u012bbas tiesved\u012bbask\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 tiek risin\u0101ts ties\u0101 civilliet\u0101 Nr. C71202120. Turkl\u0101t SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d pras\u012bjums k\u0101 kreditoriem, kuram ir ties\u012bbas saska\u0146ot pl\u0101nu, ir otraisliel\u0101kais.[6.2] Ja iebildumi sa\u0146emti no personas, kuras mantisk\u0101s ties\u012bbas \u0161\u012b procesa rezult\u0101t\u0101 tiek b\u016btiski aizskartas, tiesa nevar aprobe\u017eoties ar nor\u0101di parto nepamatot\u012bbu, bet l\u0113mum\u0101 j\u0101nor\u0101da motiv\u0113ts kreditora iebildumu un to pamatojo\u0161u pier\u0101d\u012bjumu v\u0113rt\u0113jums. \u0100rpustiesas tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas processp\u0113c savas b\u016bt\u012bbas ir bezstr\u012bdus process, ta\u010du tas nenoz\u012bm\u0113, ka proces\u0101 iesaist\u012bt\u0101s personas nevar izmantot savas ties\u012bbas celt iebildumus, nor\u0101dot uzapst\u0101k\u013ciem, kas nepie\u013cauj \u0161\u012b procesa realiz\u0113\u0161anu.Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 40.panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca paredz, ka, \u012bstenojot tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesu, pl\u0101nu nesaska\u0146oju\u0161o kreditoru ieguvumam ir j\u0101b\u016btvismaz tikpat lielam k\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja \u0161\u0101 pl\u0101na apstiprin\u0101\u0161anas br\u012bd\u012b par\u0101dniekam tiktu pasludin\u0101ts maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas process. Tas attiecas ar\u012b uz iesp\u0113jurealiz\u0113t savas procesu\u0101l\u0101s ties\u012bbas, no k\u0101 tie\u0161i atkar\u012bgas mantisk\u0101s ties\u012bbas (sk. Sen\u0101ta 2022.gada 12.j\u016blija blakus l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr. SKC-761\/2022(ECLI:LV:AT:2022:0712.C71202120.28.L) 3.punktu).Tiesai, it \u012bpa\u0161i situ\u0101cij\u0101, kad no tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesa pl\u0101nu nesaska\u0146oju\u0161ajiem kreditoriem ir iesniegti motiv\u0113ti iebildumi par dar\u012bjumu,iesp\u0113jams, fikt\u012bvo raksturu, ir j\u0101piev\u0113r\u0161as t\u0101s r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 iesniegto dar\u012bjumu apliecino\u0161o dokumentu v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anai un j\u0101sp\u0113j izdar\u012bt lo\u0123iskus secin\u0101jumus parsaist\u012bbu pamatot\u012bbu vismaz no pirm\u0161\u0137ietam\u012bbas viedok\u013ca (sk. Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas2016.gada 28.janv\u0101ra sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr. SPC-1\/2016(C30389714) 9.punktu).\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 iepriek\u0161min\u0113to, Sen\u0101ts atz\u012bst, ka, \u012bstenojot par\u0101dnieces tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas procesu, nav izpild\u012btas Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 40.pantatre\u0161\u0101s da\u013cas pras\u012bbas par pl\u0101nu nesaska\u0146oju\u0161\u0101 kreditora ieguvumu tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas proces\u0101. Zaud\u0113jot ties\u012bbas p\u0113c saist\u012bbas izpildes bezstr\u012bdusk\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101, tam liegtas ties\u012bbas celt iebildumus savu intere\u0161u nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai, k\u0101 ar\u012b nav iev\u0113rotas Maks\u0101tnesp\u0113jas likuma 6. panta 1., 2., 8.punkta,Civilprocesa likuma 341.7 panta ceturt\u0101s da\u013cas pras\u012bbas, kas novedis pie SIA \u201eNETVISION\u201d ties\u012bbu un intere\u0161u aizsk\u0101ruma par\u0101dnieces \u0101rpustiesastiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas proces\u0101.\u0160\u0101dos apst\u0101k\u013cos tiesas2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu nevar atz\u012bt parpamatotu, t\u0101p\u0113c tas ir atce\u013cams.[6.3] SIA \u201eMIKRONET\u201d paskaidrojumos nor\u0101d\u012btais neietekm\u0113 izskat\u0101m\u0101 protesta rezult\u0101tu, jo tas v\u0113rt\u0113jams, izskatot pieteikumu no jauna.Rezolut\u012bv\u0101 da\u013caPamatojoties uz Civilprocesa likuma 474.panta 2.punktu un 485.pantu, Sen\u0101tsnol\u0113maatcelt Vidzemes rajona tiesas2022.gada 28.marta l\u0113mumu un nodot pieteikumu jaunai izskat\u012b\u0161anai taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 ties\u0101.L\u0113mums nav p\u0101rs\u016bdzams.SenatorsV. MaksimovsSenatoreA. \u010cer\u0146avskaSenators N. Salenieks212.3.198.177 02.05.2023. 13:09 Anon\u012bms sist\u0113mas lietot\u0101js<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

juristu grupa <zemgale80@mail.ru> Labdien. \u017d\u012bdietes un hahola-R\u012bgas komjaunie\u0161a Borisa Baibakova kopra\u017eojums-Latvijas zv\u0113rin\u0101ts advok\u0101ts Jurijs Baibakovs reider\u0113 Latvijas uz\u0146\u0113mums ar pervers\u0101 peredasta \u0123ener\u0101lprokutora Stuk\u0101na vispus\u012bgu atbalstu. Komunistu un bo\u013c\u0161eviku p\u0113cn\u0101c\u0113ji turpina 1940.gad\u0101, 1949.gad\u0101 ies\u0101kto ar...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":57481,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64296"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=64296"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64322,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64296\/revisions\/64322"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/57481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=64296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=64296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=64296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}