{"id":2083,"date":"2010-08-01T11:50:07","date_gmt":"2010-08-01T08:50:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=2083"},"modified":"2010-08-01T11:58:10","modified_gmt":"2010-08-01T08:58:10","slug":"velreiz-par-freimani-un-4-maija-bandu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=2083","title":{"rendered":"V\u0113lreiz par Freimani un 4. maija bandu."},"content":{"rendered":"

Latvija-, vai band\u012btu savien\u012bba \u201cLATVIJA\u201d ?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u0101tad , m\u016bsu valst\u012b, ir cilv\u0113ki t. sk. N. Mui\u017enieks un L. M\u016brniece, kuri publiski pazi\u0146o, ka vi\u0146u l\u0113mumi un domas st\u0101v augst\u0101k par kompetentas tiesas l\u0113mumu. \u0160is precedents Latvijas valstij ir daudz b\u012bstam\u0101ks, nek\u0101 cilv\u0113ku grupas v\u0113lme, izmantot savas konstitucion\u0101l\u0101s ties\u012bbas uz pulc\u0113\u0161anos, ko at\u013cauj m\u016bsu valsts likumdo\u0161ana<\/span><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

=================================================================================================<\/p>\n

\"Latvijas<\/p>\n

Foto:<\/span><\/strong> Divi uztic\u012bgi Maskavas kalpi- genoc\u012bda \u012bstenot\u0101ji pret latvie\u0161u tautu.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Atcer\u0113simies, kas rakst\u012bts Latvijas Republikas Satversmes 103. pant\u0101:
\n\u201cValsts aizsarg\u0101 iepriek\u0161 pieteiktu mierm\u012bl\u012bgu sapul\u010du un g\u0101jienu, k\u0101 ar\u012b piketu br\u012bv\u012bbu\u201d. Administrat\u012bv\u0101 rajona tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja vietnieks, tiesnesis Valters Po\u0137is atbildes rakst\u0101 port\u0101lam Diena teica, ka \u201cka g\u0101jiena aizlieg\u0161anai nebija tiesiska pamata\u201d. Te b\u016bs pilns raksts:
\n<\/strong><\/span>http:\/\/www.diena.lv\/lat\/politics\/viedokli\/nils-muiznieks-tiesa-kludijas<\/a><\/p>\n

R\u012bgas dome (RD) nebija nor\u0101d\u012bjusi pamatojumu secin\u0101jumam, ka g\u0101jiens ir v\u0113rsts uz nacion\u0101l\u0101 un, iesp\u0113jams, ar\u012b rasu naida kurin\u0101\u0161anu, t\u0101s l\u0113mums nesatur\u0113ja jebk\u0101du inform\u0101ciju no dro\u0161\u012bbas dienestiem par pas\u0101kuma organizatora person\u012bbu un iesp\u0113jamiem apdraud\u0113jumiem, t\u0101p\u0113c Administrat\u012bvajai rajona tiesai nebija argumentu, lai liegtu g\u0101jienu v\u0101cu karasp\u0113ka ien\u0101k\u0161anas gadadien\u0101. Tas izriet no tiesas s\u0113des priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja Valtera Po\u0137a rakstisk\u0101s atbildes Dienai.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"LatvijasRD balst\u012bjusies uz izteikumiem.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Foto:<\/strong><\/span> Freima\u0146a plak\u0101ts prec\u012bzi raksturo \u0161odienas Latviju. Pie varas \u0161odien atrodas starptautiska krimin\u0101listu banda. P\u0113c Tiesiskuma atjauno\u0161anas Latvij\u0101, visi \u0161ie noziedznieki tiks “izvilkti caur Nirnberga-2” un sa\u0146ems to pa\u0161u sodu ko sa\u0146\u0113ma nacistu bendes !!!\u00a0 Un,- tas neb\u016bs tikai “filozofiskais” augst\u0101kais soda m\u0113rs, bet gan re\u0101ls n\u0101vessods par genoc\u012bdu pret pa\u0161a tautu<\/span><\/span><\/strong>. \u0160is sods neb\u016bs pretrun\u0101 starptautiskajiem likumiem.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

“J<\/span>\u0101nor\u0101da, ka pieteikums un pazi\u0146ojums liecina, ka pas\u0101kuma organizatora m\u0113r\u0137is nav rasisma vai nacisma ideju sludin\u0101\u0161ana, t\u0101pat nav v\u0113rsts pret k\u0101du no n\u0101cij\u0101m. Pas\u0101kuma organizatoru nor\u0101d\u012btais m\u0113r\u0137is \u2013 latvie\u0161u patriotu godin\u0101\u0161ana \u2013 ir pie\u013caujama jebkur\u0101 kalend\u0101raj\u0101 dien\u0101. Neb\u016btu pamata apgalvot, ka \u0161\u0101ds pas\u0101kums var notikt vien\u012bgi 11.novembr\u012b vai 18.novembr\u012b,\u201d nor\u0101da V.Po\u0137is. Vi\u0146\u0161 gan nenoliedz, ka pieteic\u0113js ir izmantojis konkr\u0113to datumu un v\u0113sturiskos notikumus 1941.gada j\u016bnija beig\u0101s un j\u016blija s\u0101kum\u0101, lai piev\u0113rstu uzman\u012bbu savam pas\u0101kumam. Lietas izskat\u012b\u0161an\u0101 tam ir tikai sekund\u0101ra noz\u012bme, ja netiek pier\u0101d\u012bts, ka pas\u0101kuma m\u0113r\u0137is ir nacisma ideju sludin\u0101\u0161ana.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Vi\u0146\u0161 uzsver, ka tiesai bija j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113 RD aizliegum\u0101 ietvertais pamatojums, kas liel\u0101 m\u0113r\u0101 balst\u012bjies uz da\u017e\u0101diem g\u0101jiena pieteic\u0113ja izteikumiem RD komisijas s\u0113d\u0113. No \u0161iem izteikumiem RD l\u0113mum\u0101 secin\u0101ts, ka pas\u0101kuma m\u0113r\u0137is ir v\u0113rsts uz nacion\u0101l\u0101 un, iesp\u0113jams, ar\u012b rasu naida kurin\u0101\u0161anu. \u201cTa\u010du l\u0113mum\u0101 nav nor\u0101d\u012bti nek\u0101di apst\u0101k\u013ci, uz kuru pamata izdar\u012bti min\u0113tie secin\u0101jumi. Pieteic\u0113js tiesas s\u0113d\u0113 ar\u012b noliedza, ka b\u016btu paudis rasistiskus uzskatus vai b\u016btu v\u0113l\u0113jies sludin\u0101t nacisma ideolo\u0123iju,\u201d nor\u0101da V.Po\u0137is.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Vi\u0146\u0161 sav\u0101 atbild\u0113 ar\u012b raksta, ka s\u0113des norise RD neesot protokol\u0113ta, l\u012bdz ar to tiesai bijusi iev\u0113rojami apgr\u016btin\u0101ta iesp\u0113ja p\u0101rbaud\u012bt, k\u0101dus tie\u0161i izteikumus pieteic\u0113js pauda un k\u0101 \u0161ie izteikumi attiecas uz konkr\u0113t\u0101 pas\u0101kuma m\u0113r\u0137i. \u201cL\u012bdz ar to iest\u0101de p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas nav nodro\u0161in\u0101jusi pier\u0101d\u012bjumus g\u0101jiena aizlieguma pamatojumam. Tostarp l\u0113mums nesatur jebk\u0101du inform\u0101ciju no dro\u0161\u012bbas dienestiem par pas\u0101kuma organizatora person\u012bbu un iesp\u0113jamiem apdraud\u0113jumiem,\u201d raksta V.Po\u0137is.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Mits: policija apg\u0101ja tiesas l\u0113mumu at\u013caut g\u0101jienu<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Faktiski izjaucot ceturtdien organiz\u0113to g\u0101jienu, ko iepriek\u0161 bija sankcion\u0113jusi tiesa, ties\u012bbsarg\u0101jo\u0161\u0101s iest\u0101des apg\u0101ja likum\u0101 noteikto proced\u016bru g\u0101jiena at\u013cau\u0161anai vai aizlieg\u0161anai. \u0160\u0101du viedokli Dienai pau\u017e ties\u012bbu eksperts M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits. Aizturot organizatoru ar m\u0113r\u0137i nepie\u013caut g\u0101jiena norisi \u2013 tas nav veids, k\u0101 risin\u0101t jaut\u0101jumu par g\u0101jiena at\u013cau\u0161anu vai aizlieg\u0161anu.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

M.Mits aicina no\u0161\u0137irt notikuma emocion\u0101lo v\u0113rt\u0113jumu no juridiski korektas r\u012bc\u012bbas. Vi\u0146\u0161 pagaid\u0101m atturas v\u0113rt\u0113t tiesas l\u0113mumu, jo tas b\u016btu p\u0101rsteidz\u012bgi. To var\u0113s v\u0113rt\u0113t tad, kad b\u016bs redzama argument\u0101cija, saka M. Mits. Vi\u0146\u0161 gan pie\u013cauj, ka ac\u012bmredzot tiesas r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 nebija Dro\u0161\u012bbas policijas argument\u0101cija, k\u0101p\u0113c g\u0101jiens b\u016btu aizliedzams no dro\u0161\u012bbas aspekta.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Krievijas a\u0123ents un \u013bedjajevists N. Mui\u017enieks saka:<\/strong> (nelabais izejot br\u0113cot, saka Nils) http:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/?p=2002<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Tiesa k\u013c\u016bd\u012bj\u0101s, at\u013caujot pas\u0101kumu, kur\u0101 vair\u0101ki desmiti cilv\u0113ku v\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s atz\u012bm\u0113t 1941. gada 1.j\u016blij\u0101 notiku\u0161o V\u0101cijas karasp\u0113ka ien\u0101k\u0161anu R\u012bg\u0101, uzskata Nils Mui\u017enieks no Latvijas Universit\u0101tes Soci\u0101lo un politisko p\u0113t\u012bjumu instit\u016bta. Ja ierakst\u0101m internet\u0101 Ulda Freima\u0146a v\u0101rdu, vi\u0146\u0161 par\u0101d\u0101s ar antisem\u012btiskiem plak\u0101tiem rok\u0101s, t\u0101pat Igors \u0160i\u0161kins un Viktors Birze, nor\u0101da eksperts. \u201cTie ir \u012bsti nacisti,\u201d vi\u0146\u0161 v\u0113rt\u0113.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cGodin\u0101t le\u0123ion\u0101rus ir viens, bet slavin\u0101t nacistu ien\u0101k\u0161anu R\u012bg\u0101 ir kaut kas pavisam cits. Vi\u0146u m\u0113r\u0137i un konteksts pas\u0101kumam ir pavisam cits,\u201d uzsv\u0113ra N.Mui\u017enieks. P\u0101rsteigusi ar\u012b Dro\u0161\u012bbas policijas r\u012bc\u012bba, kas n\u0101ca klaj\u0101 ar ieteikumu aizliegt pas\u0101kumu tikai p\u0113c g\u0101jiena pieteic\u0113jiem pozit\u012bv\u0101 tiesas sprieduma.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

N.Mui\u017enieka praks\u0113 tas ir pirmais gad\u012bjums, kad notiek atkl\u0101ta nacistu slavin\u0101\u0161ana. Vi\u0146\u0161 uzskata, ka turpm\u0101k Latvij\u0101 j\u0101b\u016bt gataviem, ka \u0161\u0101das akcijas tiks izv\u0113rstas ar\u012b citos v\u0113sturiskos datumos, t\u0101p\u0113c tiesne\u0161iem un ekspertiem vajadz\u0113tu izv\u0113rt\u0113t \u0161\u012bs lietas apst\u0101k\u013cus.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cTiesa nav nek\u013c\u016bd\u012bga,\u201d atbild\u0113ja eksperts<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>uz jaut\u0101jumu, k\u0101 v\u0113rt\u0113t policijas r\u012bc\u012bbu, kas liedza notikt g\u0101jienam, lai gan to bija at\u013c\u0101vusi tiesa.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Vakar Vecr\u012bg\u0101 tika pieteikts g\u0101jiens no Okup\u0101cijas muzeja l\u012bdz Br\u012bv\u012bbas piemineklim, ko r\u012bkoja biedr\u012bbas Gustava Celmi\u0146a centrs biedri un atbalst\u012bt\u0101ji. Vi\u0146i v\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s atz\u012bm\u0113t 1941. gada 1.j\u016blij\u0101 notiku\u0161o V\u0101cijas karasp\u0113ka ien\u0101k\u0161anu R\u012bg\u0101. Policija g\u0101jienu apst\u0101din\u0101ja, tam \u012bsti nes\u0101koties, organiz\u0113t\u0101ji tika izol\u0113ti. G\u0101jienu un ziedu nolik\u0161anu negrib\u0113ja pie\u013caut R\u012bgas dome. Organiz\u0113t\u0101ji to p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja un tiesa pas\u0101kumu at\u013c\u0101va.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u0101tad partijas \u201cJaunais Laiks\u201d varas laikos bija iegro\u017eots Br\u012bv\u012bbas piemineklis 2006. gad\u0101 (kad R\u012bgas domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js bija partijas \u201cJaun\u0101 Laika\u201d biedrs Aivars Aksenoks<\/span> un \u0100rlietu ministre bija partijas \u201cJaunais Laiks\u201d biedre Sandra Kalniete<\/span><\/span><\/span>, apspiestas cilv\u0113ku protesta akcijas pret slimn\u012bcas sl\u0113g\u0161anu Bausk\u0101 (kad Iek\u0161lietu ministre aizvien ir partijas \u201cJaunais Laiks\u201d, tagad ar\u012b apvien\u012bbas \u201cVienot\u012bba\u201d biedre Linda M\u016brniece)<\/span> <\/span><\/span>un tagad izjaukts atbilsto\u0161i Satversmei tiesas akcept\u0113ts mierm\u012bl\u012bgais g\u0101jiens. Taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 m\u016bsdienu Latvijas mafioz\u0101 vara nebija konsekventa, kad t\u0101 at\u013c\u0101va izpausmes pie t\u0101 saucam\u0101 Uzvaras pieminek\u013ca pag\u0101ju\u0161\u0101 gada 9. maij\u0101 un \u0161ogad 9. maij\u0101.<\/span> J\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 Dro\u0161\u012bbas policija neko nedara, lai izmekl\u0113tu Pareksbankas af\u0113ru un citus noziegumus, k\u0101 ar\u012b pie\u013cauj, ka \u0161aj\u0101s dien\u0101s notiek Pareksbankas sadal\u012b\u0161ana t\u0101 saucamaj\u0101 labaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un sliktaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 ar m\u0113r\u0137i nosl\u0113pt visus galus \u016bden\u012b. Ar\u012b cilv\u0113ki pie eso\u0161\u0101s varas ir sadal\u012bti sav\u0113jos, kam at\u013cauts viss un nesav\u0113jos, kuriem ne\u013cauj izpausties. Valdo\u0161ai mafijai<\/span><\/span> nepat\u012bk, ka atrodas cilv\u0113ki, kas piev\u0113r\u0161 uzman\u012bbu \u2013 te nu m\u0113s okup\u0101cijas un valsts nozag\u0161anas upuri esam.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

inform\u0101cija ar\u012b no interneta dz\u012bl\u0113m<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

LRTT\u00a0 01.08.2010<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Latvija-, vai band\u012btu savien\u012bba \u201cLATVIJA\u201d ? T\u0101tad , m\u016bsu valst\u012b, ir cilv\u0113ki t. sk. N. Mui\u017enieks un L. M\u016brniece, kuri publiski pazi\u0146o, ka vi\u0146u l\u0113mumi un domas st\u0101v augst\u0101k par kompetentas tiesas l\u0113mumu. \u0160is...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2083"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2083"}],"version-history":[{"count":25,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2297,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2083\/revisions\/2297"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tautastribunals.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}